Wall Street Meets Greed Street
November 27, 2011 at 11:37 am 8 comments
For investors, the emotional pendulum swings back and forth between fear and greed. Wall Street and large financial institutions, however, are driven by one single mode…and that is greed. This is nothing new and has been going on for generations. Over the last few decades, cheap money, loose regulation, and a relatively healthy economy have given Wall Street and financial institutions free rein to take advantage of the system.
Not only did the financial industry explode, but the large got much larger. The FCIC (Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission), a government appointed commission, highlighted the following:
“By 2005, the 10 largest U.S. commercial banks held 55% of the industry’s assets, more than double the level held in 1990. On the eve of the crisis in 2006, financial sector profits constituted 27% of all corporate profits in the United States, up from 15% in 1980.”
What’s more, the obscene profits were achieved with obscene amounts of debt:
“From 1978 to 2007, the amount of debt held by the financial sector soared from $3 trillion to $36 trillion, more than doubling as a share of gross domestic product.”
Times have changed, and financial institutions have gone from victors to villains. Sluggish economic growth in developed countries and choking levels of debt have transitioned political policies from stimulus to austerity. This in turn has created social unrest. Who’s to blame for all of this? Well if you watch the evening news and Occupy Wall Street movement, it becomes very easy to blame Wall Street. Certainly, fat cat bankers deserve a portion of the blame. As one can see from the following list, over the last few years, the financial industry has paid for its sins with the help of a checkbook:
The disgusting amount of inequitable excess is smeared across the whole industry in this tiny, partial list. Billions of dollars in penalties and disgorged assets isn’t insignificant, but besides Bernie Madoff and Raj Rajaratnam, very little time has been scheduled behind bars for the perpetrators.
Whom Else to Blame?
Are the greedy bankers and financial institution operators the only ones to blame? Without doubt, lack of government enforcement and adequate regulation, coupled with a complacent, debt-loving public, contributed to the creation of this financial crisis monster. When the economy was rolling along, there was no problem in turning a blind-eye to subversive activity. Now, the greed cannot be ignored.
At the end of the day, voters have to correct this ugly situation. The general public and Occupy Wall Street-ers need to boycott corrupt institutions and vote in politicians who will institute fair and productive regulations (NOT more regulations). Sure corporate financial lobbyists will try to tip the scales to their advantage, but a vote from a lobbyist attending a $10,000 black-tie dinner carries the same weight as a vote coming from a Occupy Wall Street-er paying $5 for a foot-long sandwich at Subway. As Thomas Jefferson stated, “A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.”
Investor Protocol
Besides boycotting greedy institutions and using the voting booth, what else should individuals do with their investments in this structurally flawed system? First of all, find independent firms with a fiduciary duty to act in your best interest, like an RIA firm (Registered Investment Advisor). Brokers, financial consultants, financial advisors, or whatever euphemism-of-the-day is being used for an investment product pusher, may not be evil, but their incentives typically are not aligned to protect and grow your financial future (see Fees, Exploitation, and Confusion and Letter Shell Game).
There is a lot of blame to be spread around for the financial crisis, and the intersection of Wall Street and Greed Street is a major contributing factor. However, investors and voters need to wake up to the brutal realities of our structurally flawed system and take matters into their own hands. Only then can Main Street and Wall Street peacefully coexist.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients own certain exchange traded funds, but at the time of publishing SCM had no direct position in MS, UBS, C, JPM, WFC, SCHW, AMTD, BAC, GS, STT, Galleon, RBC, Subway, Amer Home, Brookside Captl, Morgan Keegan, or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC “Contact” page.
Entry filed under: Banking, Financial Markets. Tags: banks, Bernie Madoff, disgorgement, financial regulation, fines, insider trading, Occupy Wall Street, Raj Rajaratnam, RIA, SEC, Wall Street.
1.
sidoxia | December 10, 2011 at 11:03 am
New addition: Wells Fargo pays $148m to settle bond case.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2cbee732-21ba-11e1-8b93-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1g6nGxEHK
~WS
2.
sidoxia | June 13, 2012 at 10:57 am
Here’s another: $619 million in fines from ING – http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/13/business/ing-bank-to-pay-619-million-over-sanctions-violations.html?partner=yahoofinance
3.
sidoxia | June 30, 2012 at 4:53 pm
Barclays said it would pay $453.6 million to settle U.S. and U.K. charges it manipulated Libor, the interbank lending rate underpinning $360 trillion in loans and financial contracts. Another 20 banks being investigated for potential involvement.
4.
sidoxia | July 17, 2012 at 4:27 pm
How about another $175 million for Wells Fargo: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anna-cuevas/wells-fargo-enters-into-1_b_1669579.html
5.
sidoxia | October 21, 2012 at 12:10 pm
B of A pays $2.4 billion to settle allegations it concealed information about the financial health of Merrill Lynch http://goo.gl/1pSMe
6.
sidoxia | December 2, 2012 at 1:20 pm
JPMorgan Chase and Credit Suisse will pay a combined $416.9 million to settle civil charges they misled investors on risky mortgage bonds prior to 2008, the SEC said. (Barron’s 11/17/12)
7.
sidoxia | December 12, 2012 at 2:42 pm
Ouch! That $1.9 billion HSBC fine for money laundering is going to leave a mark… http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/11/hsbc-to-pay-record-fine-to-settle-money-laundering-charges/
8.
sidoxia | December 17, 2012 at 6:21 pm
Libor rate rigging could cost UBS $1 billion (Reuters 12/16/12)http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/17/us-ubs-libor-idUSBRE8BG00620121217 UPDATE: UBS settles for $1.5 billion!