Posts tagged ‘trade’
Tariffs & Free Trade by Wade
Tariffs and trade have dominated the media headlines since the beginning of the year, creating a volatile rollercoaster ride in the financial markets and broader economy. What were screams of fear just last month turned into cheers of optimism after a trade deal between the U.S. and the U.K. was announced earlier this month.
This agreement—combined with hopes for future trade deals and the absence of runaway inflation or economic collapse—sparked a rally in stock prices. The minimum 10% baseline tariff in the U.K. agreement has fueled optimism that a simplified framework might extend to other international trade pacts. For the month, the S&P 500 surged by +6.2%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed +3.9%, and the tech-heavy NASDAQ soared by +9.6%.
However, tariffs and trade haven’t faded into the background. In fact, just this week, a federal court ruled that the president’s tariff policies were illegal, citing misuse of emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. Subsequently, the same court has granted the Trump administration a reprieve pending appeal—potentially escalating the issue to the Supreme Court. Even if the ruling stands, the president has alternative avenues to impose tariffs through other legal mechanisms.
So, what is all this fuss over tariffs and trade really about? I’ve previously written extensively on the topic (“Tariff Sheriff”), but some fundamental economic concepts still get lost in the tariff chaos noise.
It’s true that many countries engage in unfair trade practices against the U.S.—including subsidies, currency manipulation, non-tariff barriers, dumping, quotas, complex permitting, and value-added taxes (VAT). However, the powerful benefits of free trade are often underappreciated or poorly explained by the pundits.
Tariffs and Free Trade 101: China & France Experiment
To illustrate, let’s reference an example drawn from an op-ed by Princeton economist Burton Malkiel, author of the legendary finance book A Random Walk Down Wall Street.
Every country enjoys a comparative advantage in producing certain goods. For example, China historically benefits from low labor costs, making it a global manufacturing hub. Meanwhile, the U.S. leads in technological innovation, and countries like Brazil leverage vast land resources to dominate agricultural exports—such as being the world’s top coffee exporter. Let’s consider a simplified example using two countries: China and France, each with 100 labor hours available, and only able to produce T-shirts and wine.
China’s Output (see graphic above) – China’s comparative advantage in making more T-shirts than bottles of wine results in the following:
- 50 hours = 50 T-shirts
- 50 hours = 10 bottles of wine
France’s Output (see graphic above) – France’s comparative advantage in making more bottles of wine than T-shirts results in the following:
- 50 hours = 50 bottles of wine
- 50 hours = 20 T-shirts
Combined Total (China + France): 70 T-shirts + 60 bottles of wine = 130 total units of goods.
Example #2: Production Plan #2 (Each country specializes in their comparative advantage)
China’s Output (T-shirt specialization):
- 100 hours = 100 T-shirts
France’s Output (Wine specialization):
- 100 hours = 100 bottles of wine
Combined Total: 100 T-shirts + 100 bottles of wine = 200 total units of goods.
But here’s the challenge: the Chinese still want wine, and the French still want T-shirts. That’s where free trade comes in – see next example (graphic below).
Example #3: Production Plan #2 + Free Trade
Through free trade, each country can specialize in what they do best and then trade for other goods wanted or needed. If China trades 50 T-shirts for 50 bottles of wine with France, both countries end up with:
- China: 50 T-shirts + 50 bottles of wine
- France: 50 bottles of wine + 50 T-shirts
This plan produces 54% more total goods than the original production plan (200 vs. 130 – Example #1), with no increase in labor hours. China gets 300% more wine, and France gets 150% more T-shirts—a clear win-win.
Today’s Tariff Reality
In 2024, the U.S. trade deficit stood at $918 billion. President Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy aims to reduce this gap by incentivizing domestic manufacturing, increasing exports, and reducing imports. The challenge is that tariffs also raise prices for consumers and disrupt the benefits of free trade.
If the administration succeeds in establishing fairer rules for a level trading field, increasing government revenue, and narrowing the trade deficit, then history will likely view President Trump’s tariff policy favorably. But if tariffs lead to higher prices, inflation, and a weaker economy, the tariff policy may be judged as a costly misstep. The stock market, voters, and time will ultimately serve as the principal judges.
Looking ahead, two key dates are on the calendar:
- July 9 marks the end of the 90-day reciprocal tariff pause. Without new trade agreements, tariffs will spike on imports from many countries — raising costs for consumers.
- July 4 is not only Independence Day, but also the target date for Senate Republicans to pass the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, which packages several of President Trump’s top priorities: tax cuts, welfare reform, energy expansion, and border security. While the bill could stimulate growth, critics warn of its potential to balloon the national deficit.
Most Americans support the idea of fairer global trade. The question is whether aggressive tariffs across the globe are the right tool to achieve that goal — and whether trading partners will agree to new deals. Regardless of the outcome, this crash course in Tariffs & Free Trade 101 underscores the enduring value of specialization and free trade, even amid today’s turbulent tariff battles.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (June 2, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Animal Spirits to Animal Hibernation
Investor mood or sentiment can change rather quickly. Immediately after the 2024 presidential elections, positive animal spirits catapulted the stock market higher due to hopes of stimulating tax cuts and deregulation legislation. However, those warm and fuzzy feelings soured last month, as investor focus shifted to on-again, off-again tariff talks, and stagflation concerns, which have converted animal spirits into gloomy feelings of hibernation.
As a result, the advancing bull market took a breather and transformed into a weary bear during March. For the month, the S&P 500 (-5.8%), NASDAQ (-8.2%), and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-4.2%) all fell significantly in the wake of tariffs, inflation, and recession worries.
Lovely Liberation Day or Tariff Trouble?
Since the President took office in January, he has announced, reversed, and implemented tariffs across a wide range of countries and sectors, including China, Canada, Mexico, the EU, Colombia, Venezuela, steel, aluminum, oil, automobiles, digital services taxes, and more.
The day of reckoning begins on April 2nd, designated Liberation Day by the president. This is when the president and the White House officially announce global reciprocal tariffs on foreign countries in an attempt to reverse the nation’s large trade deficit (see chart below) and bring manufacturing back to the United States. For example, if Germany subsidizes BMW cars sold in the U.S. while simultaneously placing tariffs (i.e., additional taxes) on American Ford Explorers sold in Germany, the president wants to impose equivalent reciprocal tariffs on those same BMWs sold in the U.S. in an effort to level the trading playing field. On the surface, a $131 billion trade deficit sounds very significant, but when compared to a $30 trillion economy (Gross Domestic Product – GDP), this negative trade balance represents less than 0.5% of GDP – effectively a rounding error. I have previously written how tariffs represent more of a molehill than a mountain (see Tariff Sheriff), in part because consumer spending and services make up the vast majority of our country’s economic activity, whereas trade and manufacturing are relatively smaller segments.
Source: Trading Economics
Driving home the point that tariffs are more bark than bite, Senior White House trade and manufacturing counselor Peter Navarro recently stated the 2025 tariffs could add $700 billion annually to U.S. revenues, including $100 billion from the recently announced 25% auto tariffs. Many economists believe this collection estimate is too optimistic. However, even if this target is achievable, $700 billion only represents a measly 2% of overall GDP.
Tariffs = Recession or Stagflation?
With the recent stock market downdraft and growing concerns related to tariffs, some economists and pundits are raising the probability of a recession and the possibility of inflation accompanying an economic downturn (i.e., stagflation).
Economic data should clear some of the fog. Fresh employment numbers will be released this Friday, which should shine some light on the health of the economy. Irrespective of this month’s results, the most recent 4.1% unemployment rate (see chart below), though slightly higher over the last two years, does not strongly indicate a recession.
Source: Trading Economics
Other “hard” data, such as GDP, also suggest a slowing economy rather than a recession. For instance, a recent survey of 14 economists estimates the economy is growing at a paltry +0.3% rate in Q1 – 2025 versus +2.3% in Q4 – 2024. Data is continually changing, but if a looming recession were imminent, corporate earnings would likely be trending downward, not upwards, as evident in the chart below.
Source: Yardeni Research
Tariff Inflation Has Yet to Arrive
There is no doubt tariffs function as a tax hike on consumers because U.S. companies that pay the tariffs on imported goods are eventually forced to raise prices to maintain profit margins or limit margin degradation.
Nonetheless, inflation did not spike under President Trump’s first term. Even if the president’s new policies result in more aggressive tariff actions this go-around, inflation will likely remain in check due to the point mentioned earlier – imported goods represent a small percentage of overall consumer and business purchases.
Tariff implementation is just beginning, so only time will tell how pervasive inflation will become. However, what we do know now is that inflation has declined dramatically over the last couple of years and has not yet spiked (see Consumer Price Index chart below).
Source: Calafia Beach Pundit
Where Could I Be Wrong?
I have explained how some of the lagging “hard” data does not signal recession or stagflation, but what could I be missing? For starters, some of the leading “soft” data (e.g., surveys) indicate various cracks in the economic foundation are forming. Take the recent Consumer Confidence data (see chart below), which has weakened dramatically from pre-COVID and even post-COVID levels.
Source: Trading Economics
It’s not just consumers who are feeling uneasy about the economic environment; businesses are as well. Another soft data point flashing red is the NFIB Small Business Uncertainty index, which recently reported its second-highest reading in 48 years (see chart below). Even if my argument that tariffs are too small to materially impact the economy holds, if the psychological effects of tariff uncertainty paralyzes consumer and business economic activity to a standstill, then tariffs could indeed become a substantial factor.
Source: National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)
What Comes Next After Liberation Day?
Liberation Day is unlikely to trigger an immediate and sustained V-shaped recovery in the stock market because international trading partners will be forced to announce retaliatory tariffs in response to President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, potentially leading to additional reactionary tariffs by the U.S.
Additionally, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2nd will likely serve as a starting point for subsequent negotiations with trading partners. Without a comprehensive resolution, investor sentiment will likely remain somewhat unresolved and unsettled. Regardless of your views on the size and impact of tariffs, Liberation Day will at least bring some clarity and reduce the uncertainty surrounding the current murky and chaotic environment.
The multi-year bull market continued its charge after the presidential election, but investor sentiment has weakened the bull run due to tariff uncertainty. In response, the excited bull has temporarily turned into a sleepy bear. Depending on how these tariff events unfold, we will soon find out whether Liberation Day will awaken the bear to hunt for bulls or send it into deep hibernation.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (April 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in F or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Par for the Course
Stocks have been in a multi-year bull market, but just as investors cannot earn positive returns every month, golfers also cannot achieve a hole-in-one or birdie on every hole, either. A challenging performance is exactly what happened last month when stocks recorded a bogey on the scorecard.
More specifically, this is how far out-of-bounds the major indexes were last month:
- S&P 500: -1.4%
- Dow Jones Industrial Average -1.6%
- NASDAQ: -4.0%
Technology stocks and the Magnificent 7 stocks felt the largest brunt of the force last month as tariffs and the impact of Chinese AI (Artificial Intelligence) competition gave investors heartburn as they digested the information (see New Year, New AI ERA & New Tariff Sheriff).
Tariffs – More Molehill Than Mountain
As mentioned, a large part of last month’s volatility can be explained by the policy uncertainty surrounding the impending tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico. Despite the absence of new tariffs being implemented, in an attempt to lock in cheaper imported goods, U.S. corporations and consumers have been stockpiling foreign goods before prices move higher due to tariffs. The 25% proposed tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods are set to be applied as soon as March 4th. A flat 25% tariff on imported steel and aluminum products is expected to begin on March 12th – these particular tariffs are expected to have a disproportionately negative impact on the automotive industry.
Regarding other proposed reciprocal trade agreements, the White House’s analysis on tariffs for all other countries (beyond China, Canada, and Mexico) is expected to arrive on the president’s desk on April 2nd.
All these proposed changes are having an immediate economic impact whether intended or not. Not only are consumers buying more overseas products now, as they brace for higher prices, but businesses are also shifting supply chains to countries outside of China, Canada, and Mexico, in hopes of finding temporary tariff loopholes.
The bottom-line is our country’s imports have been spiking up recently, especially in the first quarter. Imports by definition subtract from America’s economic activity, so if businesses and consumers are rationally stockpiling foreign goods before prices go up from tariffs, investors should not be surprised that GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth is set to go negative in the first quarter (-1.5%), according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
This short-term spike in foreign product purchases should be temporary until the tariffs are officially put in place. Subsequently, demand for relatively cheaper U.S. goods should rise because foreign goods will be pricier. In other words, buyers may begin purchasing more American-made t-shirts on Amazon because those shirts could be cheaper than the Chinese-made t-shirts after the additional tariffs commence on China.
How large are these overall tariffs? When it comes to Mexico and Canada, the size of these countries’ imports is estimated at $918 billion (see the 2023 import breakdown below for the two countries). On the surface, this sounds like a very large number, and it is. However, if you consider the size of the U.S. GDP ($29.4 trillion), these tariffs will mathematically have less than a 1% impact on the direction of our country’s economic activity.
However, if demand for American products goes up after the tariffs begin, as mentioned above, then it is perfectly logical to expect the drag from imports can be diminished or possibly completely reversed, if consumers decide to buy more American goods.
Source: Visual Capitalist
Also worth noting, as I documented last month in my Investing Caffeine blog, imports only account for 13.9% of our country’s economic activity (see New Tariff Sheriff). So, while tariffs make for great scary headlines, the reality of the numbers paints a different picture. Overall, the uncertainty surrounding the discussion of tariffs is having a much larger economic impact than the actual tariffs themselves. In other words, what we are discussing is more molehill than mountain. We saw this same movie before during the administration’s first-term when tariffs did not crater the economy into recession or create disproportionately high inflation.
War at the White House
A geopolitical soap opera played out on global television last Friday during a meeting between Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Trump in the Oval Office. The meeting was designed to be a celebratory signing of a minerals deal in which the U.S. would gain access to strategically important Ukrainian rare earth metals in exchange for continued U.S. aid and military support. A signed deal would increase the probability of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine dramatically. What actually happened was a war of words at the White House, which resulted in Zelensky getting kicked out of the White House with no signed deal.
Both sides have economic and strategic incentives to reengage in peace and mineral deal negotiations, but if the U.S.-Ukraine relationship totally crumbles, Europe and the other NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) countries will need to pick up the slack in their military and economic aid to Ukraine. Regardless, increased European support is required to stave off a broader incursion by Russia and Vladimir Putin into a wider portion of Europe.
Tariffs, the Russia-Ukraine war, and AI issues may have heightened investor anxiety last month, but long-term investors understand that annual -5% and -10% corrections in the equity markets are considered par for the course. In fact, over the last 12 months, the S&P 500 index has declined -5% five times, and -10% one time, yet the stock market is still up +16% on a trailing 12-month basis (see chart below).
Source: Trading Economics
Financial markets end up in the rough plenty of the time, which often results in performance scorecard bogeys. However, long-term investors and Sidoxia Capital Management clients have won more often than not because the benefits of American capitalism have created many more birdies and pars over time.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (March 3, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in META, NVDA, certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in BABA or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
New Year, New AI Era & New Tariff Sheriff
The first month of 2025 started with a bang when newly-inaugurated President Donald Trump announced a groundbreaking AI (artificial intelligence) program led by business titan thought leaders called Stargate, which promises to spend a half trillion dollars on AI data center infrastructure projects and create hundreds of thousands of jobs. Just one week later, a wet blanket was placed on the Stargate euphoria when a Chinese AI upstart announced a technological breakthrough. Stocks moved lower on the last day of the month when Trump added insult to injury by confirming 25% Mexican/Canadian tariffs and 10% additional Chinese tariffs would be implemented immediately.
Regardless, positive economic and corporate data coupled with other pro-business fiscal policies (e.g., deregulation and lower proposed taxes) allowed the financial markets to finish the month with respectable gains. More specifically, the S&P 500 surged higher by +2.7%; the NASDAQ +1.6%; and the Dow Jones Industrial Average +4.7%.
DeepSeek = Deep AI Trouble?
Ever since OpenAI launched its ChatGPT language model (LLM) at the end of 2022, the global AI gold rush began. Just as the United States appeared to be dominating the AI race to global superiority, a bombshell was recently released, when a new Chinese AI upstart, DeepSeek, released a white paper claiming the company’s R1 large language model (LLM) rivaled competitors’ LLMs like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Meta’s Llama (META), Anthropic’s Claude, and Alibaba’s Qwen (BABA) for a small fraction of the price spent by DeepSeek’s American rivals. The “DeepSeek Freak” caused a chain reaction of selling across a wide swath of companies (including NVIDIA Corp – NVDA) that have benefitted from hundreds of billions in AI infrastructure spending. The fear that Chinese AI competition may leapfrog U.S. companies, and potentially dramatically reduce AI-related capital expenditures caused the NASDAQ to almost fall -2% last week, and AI juggernaut NVIDIA shed more than a half trillion dollars in the company’s market value in a single day. Overall, U.S. stocks lost more than a trillion dollars in value on the day of the DeepSeek Freak unveiling.
Although investors were initially panicked by the DeepSeek revelations, not all of the Chinese claims have been substantiated. In fact, a just-released report by SemiAnalysis, a semiconductor research and consulting firm, states that DeepSeek’s costs for its R1 LLM likely exceed $500 million, much higher than the $6 million training costs stated in DeepSeek’s initial pronouncement.
Source: NBC News
New Tariff Sheriff in Town
While many investors were hoping for a delay in the implementation of President Trump’s tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China, Trump decided to move full steam ahead with a February 1st start date. In 2023, Mexico was the U.S.’s largest trade partner and Canada was the second largest. These Mexican and Canadian tariffs are very broad based and impact many different industries, including autos, agricultural products, and crude oil. You can see the extent of the impact in the graphic below graphic below.
Source: VisualCapitalist.com
But what does this mean for the economy? In short, it will mean higher prices for U.S. consumers and businesses. The Tax Foundation, an 85-year-old, non-partisan, tax policy non-profit attempted to quantify some of the potential impacts from the proposed tariffs. The bottom-line findings from the Tax Foundation were that tariffs would “shrink economic output by -0.4% and increase taxes by $1.2 trillion between 2025 and 2034 on a conventional basis, amounting to an average tax increase of more than $830 per US household in 2025.” Please, also see table below (Scenario 2).
Source: Tax Foundation
In addition to American consumers having to pay higher taxes and prices for tariffed import products, there will be an estimated -344,000 jobs lost and there could be unintended consequences from retaliatory tariffs imposed on U.S. exports (i.e., our goods shipped internationally will be priced uncompetitively). In fact, Canada and Mexico just jointly announced tit-for-tat tariffs on U.S. goods and services, which will hurt these U.S. sales abroad.
With all of that said, the bark of the 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, along with the 10% in additional tariffs on China could be worse than the actual bite. Especially, if Trump uses these tariffs successfully as a negotiating tool and provides foreign countries with significant exemptions.
It’s also important to keep the size of these tariffs in context. Imports of foreign good and services only represented 13.9% of the Unted States’ Gross Domestic Product in 2023. Of that small percentage of imports, Mexico, Canada, and China only represent a fraction of that. It’s true that imports subtract from our country’s economic activity, but even if tariffs on foreign goods lead to the consumption of more American manufactured products, those benefits will be somewhat offset by higher inflated prices that will pinch consumer wallets. The new year marks an exciting new era of AI and global trade, but with that comes many new threats and opportunities. Throughout our 17-year history at Sidoxia Capital Management, we have successfully navigated these pivot points, and we are excited about effectively managing through this current transitional period.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (February 3, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in META, NVDA, certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in BABA or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Chinese Checkers or Chess?
There’s been a high stakes economic game of trade going on between the United States and China, but it’s unclear what actual game is being played or what the rules are? Is it Chinese checkers, chess, or some other game?
Currently, the rules of the U.S.-China trade war game are continually changing. Most recently, the U.S. has implemented 15% in added tariffs (on approximately $125 billion in Chinese consumer imports) on September 1st. The president and his administration appreciate the significance of trade negotiations, especially as it relates to his second term reelection campaign, which is beginning to swing into full gear. However, game enthusiasts also understand you can’t win or truly play a game, if you don’t know the rules? In that same vein, investors have been confused about the U.S.-China trade game as the president’s Twitter account has been blowing up with tariff threats and trade discussion updates. As a negotiating tactic, the current unpredictable trade talks spearheaded by the Trump administration have been keeping investors guessing whether there will be a successful deal payoff. Until then, market participants have been sitting on the sidelines watching the stock market volatility unfold, one tweet at a time.
Here’s what the president has planned for other tariffs:
- October 1: Tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese goods rise to 30%.
- November 17: Europe auto tariff deadline.
- December 15: 15% tariffs on $160 billion in Chinese goods.
This uncertain game translated into all the major stock market averages vacillating to an eventual decline last month, with a price chart resembling a cardiogram. More specifically, after bouncing around wildly, the S&P 500 decreased -1.8% last month (see chart below), the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped -1.7%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq fell -2.6%.
Politically, there is bipartisan support to establish new trade rules and there is acknowledgement that China has been cheating and breaking trade rules for decades. The consensus among most constituencies is especially clear as it relates to Chinese theft of our intellectual property, forced technology transfer, and barriers for U.S. companies to invest in China.
Beyond trade talks, China has been stirring the geopolitical pot through its involvement in the political instability occurring in Hong Kong, which is a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China. For over five months Hong Kong has had to deal with mass demonstration and clashes with police primarily over a proposed extradition bill that Hong Kong people fear would give mainland China control and jurisdiction over the region. Time will tell whether the protests will allow Hong Kong to remain relatively independent, or the Chinese Communist party will eventually lose patience and use an authoritarian response to the protesters.
Inverted Yield Curve: Fed No Longer Slamming Breaks in Front of Feared Recession
Another issue contributing to recent financial market volatility has been the so-called “inverted yield curve.” Typically, an economic recession has been caused by the Federal Reserve slamming the breaks on an overheated economy by raising short-term interest rates (Federal Funds target rate). Historically, as short-term rates rise and increase borrowing costs (i.e., slow down economic activity), long-term interest rates eventually fall amid expected weak economic activity. When declining long-term interest rates fall below short-term interest rates…voila, you have an inverted yield curve. Why is this scary? Ever since World War II, history has informed us that whenever this phenomenon has occurred, this dynamic has been a great predictor for a looming recession.
What’s different this time? Unlike the past, is it possible the next recession can be averted or delayed? One major difference is the explosion in negative interest rate yielding bonds now reaching $17 trillion.
Yes, you read that correctly, investors are lining up in droves for guaranteed losses – if these bonds are held until maturity. This widespread perception as a move to perceived safety has not protected the U.S. from the global rate anchor sinking our long-term interest rates. United States interest rates have not turned negative (yet?), but rates have fallen by more than half over the last 10 months from +3.24% to +1.51% on the 10-Year Treasury Note. Will this stimulate businesses to borrow and consumers to buy homes (i.e., through lower cost mortgages), or are these negative rates a sign of a massive global slowdown? The debate continues, but in the meantime, I’m going to take advantage of a 0%-interest rate loan to buy me an 85″ big screen television for my new home!
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (September 3, 2019). Subscribe on the right side of the page for the complete text.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions and certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
Don’t Fear the Free Trade Boogeyman
Are you having trouble falling asleep because of a ghostly nightmare? Donald Trump, along with a wide range of pundits and investors have been afraid of globalization and the free trade boogeyman. Donald Trump may or may not win the presidential election, but regardless, his inflammatory rhetoric regarding trade is way off base.
Free trade has been demonized as a job destroyer, however history paints a different picture. I have written on the subject before (see also Invisible Benefits of Free Trade), but with Americans digesting the current debates and the election only a month away, let me make a couple of key points.
Standard of Living Benefits: For centuries, the advantages of free trade and globalization have lifted the standards of living for billions of people. There is a reason the World Trade Organization (WTO) has united more than 160 countries without one country exiting since the global trade group began in 1948. Trade did not suddenly stop working when the Donald began lashing out against NAFTA, TPP and Oreo cookies. Trump rails against trade despite Trump ties being made in China.
Job losses are easy to identify (like the Oreo jobs moved to Mexico from Chicago), but most trade benefits are often invisible to the untrained eye. As Dan Ikenson of the Cato Institute explains, if low-wage labor was not used offshore to manufacture products sold to Americans, many amazing and spectacular products and services would become unaffordable for the U.S. mass markets. Thanks to cheaper foreign imports, not only can a wider population buy iPhones and use services like Uber and Airbnb, but consumers will have extra discretionary income resources that can be redeployed into savings. Alternatively, the extra savings could be spent on other goods and services to help spur U.S. economic growth in various sectors of our nation.
It doesn’t make for a nice, quick political soundbite, but Ikenson highlights,
“The benefits of trade come from imports, which deliver more competition, greater variety, lower prices, better quality, and new incentives for innovation.”
Strong Companies Hire and Grow: Plain and simply, profitable businesses hire employees, and money-losing companies fire employees. Business success boils down to competitiveness. If your product is not better and/or cheaper than competitors, then you will lose money and be forced into stagnation, or worse, be forced to fire employees or shut down your business. Free trade affords businesses the opportunity to improve the cost or quality of a product. Take Apple Inc. (AAPL) for example, the company’s ability to build a global supply chain has allowed the company to offer products and services to more than 1 billion users. If Apple was forced to manufacture exclusively in the U.S., the company’s sales and profits would be lower, and so too would the number of U.S. Apple employees.
Fortunately, no matter who gets elected president, if the rhetoric against free trade reaches a feverish pitch, investors can rest assured that the president’s powers to implement widespread tariffs and rip up longstanding trade deals is limited. He/she will still be forced to follow the authority of Congress, which still controls the nuts and bolts of our economy’s trade policies. In other words, there is nothing to fear…even not the free trade boogeyman.
Other Trade Related Articles on Investing Caffeine:
Jumping on the Globalization Train
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs) and AAPL, MDLZ, but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
Investing Caffeine 
