Posts tagged ‘tariffs’
Trade & OBBB Deals Sealed, Fed Dread, and AI/Meme Dreams
As the stock market reached new all-time highs, investors had plenty to juggle—both in Washington, D.C., and on Wall Street. The S&P 500 climbed +2.2%, the NASDAQ surged +3.7%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average edged higher by +0.1% for the month.
The One Big Beautiful Bill
What has fueled the rally? A major catalyst was President Trump’s signing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB) on July 4th. The nearly 900-page legislation spans a broad range of economic issues including tax reform, healthcare, energy policy, and national security.
According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the combined impact of tax cuts, new spending, and spending reductions will result in a net cost of $3.4 trillion over 10 years (see chart above). Supporters of the bill argue that this projection underestimates the long-term stimulative effects of tax relief and strategic investments. Whether the deficit widens as the CBO projects, or narrows thanks to a stronger, growing economy, remains to be seen.
Trade Deals Sealed
Since Liberation Day on April 2nd, trade negotiations have progressed unevenly. The administration’s reciprocal tariff hikes were paused through August 1st to allow final agreements to be reached. Following months of tough rhetoric, multiple major trading partners ultimately signed deals before the deadline—including the European Union, Japan, the United Kingdom, Vietnam, and South Korea—thereby avoiding punitive tariffs.
Talks with our two key trading partners, Mexico and Canada, remain ongoing. While Mexico was granted a 90-day extension amid constructive dialogue, Trump slapped a 35% tariff on Canada (from 25%) due to what the White house said was “continued inaction and retaliation.” The tariff pause with China stops on August 12th.
Here’s a list of the new country tariffs released by the president late yesterday: CLICK HERE
Regardless of all the tariff uncertainty, investor sentiment improved last month as the terms of the signed deals were significantly milder than originally feared.
Adding to the optimism:
- Core inflation in June remained modest at 2.8% (Reuters), and
- Tariff revenues collected through July reached $126 billion, beating initial estimates (Politico) – see chart below. Strategist Ed Yardeni forecasts that 2025 tariff revenues could surge to between $400 billion and $500 billion (Barron’s).
Source: Politico
Fed Dread
Of course, when it comes to financial markets, everything can’t just be rainbows and unicorns without something for investors to worry about—and this month, a key concern remains Federal Reserve policy. Critics, including the president, argue that interest rates are too high, with the Federal Funds Rate currently set at 4.25%–4.50% (Yardeni Research) – see chart below.
By comparison:
- The European Central Bank’s Deposit Facility Rate stands at 2.00%, and
- The Bank of Japan’s overnight rate is only 0.50%.
Source: Yardeni Research
Fed Chair Jerome Powell has held off on further cuts, citing the need for more clarity on inflation and labor market data, especially in light of recent tariffs. Ironically, when the Fed last cut rates by -1.00% late last year, the 10-year Treasury yield rose by roughly +1% (see chart above), reflecting fears of rising inflation.
This week, the Fed held rates steady for the fifth consecutive meeting (YouTube). Notably, two FOMC members—Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman—dissented, voting in favor of a rate cut. It was the first dual dissent by Fed governors in over 30 years—a clear signal of division inside the central bank.
Meme Dreams
With the major indexes at new highs, speculation has returned in full force. Money-losing, struggling companies like Opendoor Technologies, GoPro Inc., and Kohl’s Corp. saw their shares double, triple, or even quadruple over a short span (WSJ) – see chart below. We saw similar trends occur during the GameStop and AMC meme craze in 2021.
Source: The Wall Street Journal
Adding fuel to the fire:
- Cryptocurrency prices are on the rise again.
- Euphorically priced IPOs (Initial Public Offerings) like Figma, Inc. (FIG), which more than tripled in value ($115 per share) on its first trading day above its offering price ($33 per share) valuing the company above $50 billion – more than 30 times next year’s forecasted revenues.
- SPACs (Special Purpose Acquisition Companies)—often criticized for poor governance—are staging a comeback.
Combined, all these trends raise concerns about froth, which investors have experienced at previous peaks.
Climb in AI Stocks Persists
No discussion of this rally would be complete without highlighting the AI mega-cap giants. Companies like Alphabet (Google), Meta (Facebook), Microsoft, and Amazon all recently announced capital expenditures for 2025 that will likely exceed an astounding $350 billion —most of it allocated to AI infrastructure.
Meanwhile, NVIDIA Corp., the AI-chip juggernaut and major beneficiary of all the AI capex, has seen its share price soar +63% in just three months, reaching a staggering $4.4 trillion market value.
Source: Yardeni Research
Valuations High but Fundamentals Remain Strong
While stock valuations remain elevated above historical averages (the S&P 500 red line trades at 22x forward earnings, according to Yardeni) – see chart above, the macro backdrop remains supportive:
- The economy is strong,
- Unemployment is low,
- Corporate profits are growing, and
- Monetary policy may turn more accommodative in coming months.
In this momentum environment, the market should continue its productive juggling, but if the frothy or economic winds worsen, investors should be prepared for a dropped ball.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (August 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in GOOGL, META, AMZN, MSFT, NVDA, and certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in OPEN, GPRO, KSS, GME, AMC, FIG or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
Mideast War an Investor Bore as Markets Soar
If I told you at the beginning of the year that the U.S. would bomb key nuclear sites in Iran, would you have guessed that Middle East stability would follow—and that global financial markets would soar to record highs? Personally, I wouldn’t have bet on that outcome. But that’s exactly what happened last month. While geopolitical dynamics remain fluid, markets shrugged off the chaos. The S&P 500 rallied +5.0%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed +4.3%, and the NASDAQ catapulted +6.6%, powered largely by artificial intelligence stocks like NVIDIA Corp., which surged +16.9% for the month to a market value of $3.9 trillion (more on AI below). This is an important reminder that trading off of news headlines is a fool’s errand.
Economy Resilient Despite Tariffs and Geopolitical Turmoil
Source: Calafia Beach Pundit
Credit Default Swaps (CDS) act as insurance contracts that protect investors against corporate debt defaults. During financial stress—like the 2008 crisis or the COVID crash in 2020—CDS prices surge as investors seek protection. Today, however, CDS prices are falling across both high-yield (junk bonds) and investment-grade (Blue Chip) debt. As seen in the chart above, the cost to insure corporate bonds has declined steadily over the past two years. This signals bond investors aren’t worried about a recession or a wave of defaults, despite tariff policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and modest GDP growth.
Inflation Tame as Tariffs Loom
President Trump has repeatedly criticized Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not cutting interest rates, calling him everything from a “dummy” to a “major loser” and a “stupid person” to a “numbskull”. While the name-calling is colorful, the economic pressure is real: U.S. GDP contracted -0.5% in Q1 2025. Powell, however, wants to see the full impact of upcoming tariffs before making a move. . A new tariff deadline looms on July 9th, and the market is anxiously awaiting clarity. But even if tariffs are implemented, many economists believe the inflationary impact will be temporary—what’s known as a one-time price shock.
Source: Calafia Beach Pundit
The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge—the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index—has been easing and is now near the 2% target (see chart above). With inflation cooling, Trump’s case for rate cuts gains credibility. Still, the Fed appears in no rush. It will take time to understand the lasting effects of the tariff rollout.
AI Wave Fueling Markets
For a generation, the semiconductor revolution has quietly powered innovation, guided by Moore’s Law—the principle that chip performance doubles roughly every two years (see my article The Traitorous 8). Sixty years after Gordon Moore wrote his seminal article, “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits”, the power of software is catching up. NVIDIA’s Grace Blackwell GB200 chip contains an astronomical 208 billion transistors, supercharging AI software models like ChatGPT.
The AI revolution is fueling trillions in global investment and rapidly transforming industries – from data centers and self-driving cars to robotics and drug discovery. It’s important to realize that this AI arms race is not just occurring in the United States. AI investment spending extends way beyond Silicon Valley to countries like Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and China.
The AI boom is not a U.S.-only phenomenon. Countries like China, Saudi Arabia, and Singapore are pouring capital into AI, creating a global arms race in tech. In the U.S., the four biggest hyperscalers—Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and Meta—are projected to spend over $300 billion on capital expenditures in 2025 alone (see chart below).
To illustrate the scale: Amazon is forecasted to spend more than $100 billion in CapEx this year. For context, that’s 40% more than the company spent over the entire 2000–2020 period combined.
Source: The Financial Times
The Stargate Initiative: AI Infrastructure on a Galactic Scale
A prime example of the AI gold rush is the $500 billion Stargate initiative, with Phase 1 already underway in Abilene, Texas (see rendering below). The initial construction includes two buildings totaling 1,000,000 square feet. Ultimately, the full project will cove about 1,000 acres and be powered by an on-site natural gas facility generating 360 megawatts—enough to support 300,000 homes.
A huge portion of the project costs are dedicated to the budget for NVIDIA super chips. Oracle Corp. has committed $40 billion to purchase 400,000 of NVIDIA’s GB200 chips, making this project a centerpiece of the global AI infrastructure boom. Just this week, Oracle also announced a new $30 billion cloud deal, which will soak up a good chunk of the data center supply created by the database and enterprise software company.
Source: CoStar
The Big Picture: Volatility and Opportunity
There’s no shortage of risk—geopolitics, inflation, Fed uncertainty, tariffs. But the economy is showing surprising resilience. If tariff clarity improves, interest rate cuts materialize, and AI capital spending accelerates, a “boring” market could rapidly turn into a soaring one.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (July 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Tariffs & Free Trade by Wade
Tariffs and trade have dominated the media headlines since the beginning of the year, creating a volatile rollercoaster ride in the financial markets and broader economy. What were screams of fear just last month turned into cheers of optimism after a trade deal between the U.S. and the U.K. was announced earlier this month.
This agreement—combined with hopes for future trade deals and the absence of runaway inflation or economic collapse—sparked a rally in stock prices. The minimum 10% baseline tariff in the U.K. agreement has fueled optimism that a simplified framework might extend to other international trade pacts. For the month, the S&P 500 surged by +6.2%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed +3.9%, and the tech-heavy NASDAQ soared by +9.6%.
However, tariffs and trade haven’t faded into the background. In fact, just this week, a federal court ruled that the president’s tariff policies were illegal, citing misuse of emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. Subsequently, the same court has granted the Trump administration a reprieve pending appeal—potentially escalating the issue to the Supreme Court. Even if the ruling stands, the president has alternative avenues to impose tariffs through other legal mechanisms.
So, what is all this fuss over tariffs and trade really about? I’ve previously written extensively on the topic (“Tariff Sheriff”), but some fundamental economic concepts still get lost in the tariff chaos noise.
It’s true that many countries engage in unfair trade practices against the U.S.—including subsidies, currency manipulation, non-tariff barriers, dumping, quotas, complex permitting, and value-added taxes (VAT). However, the powerful benefits of free trade are often underappreciated or poorly explained by the pundits.
Tariffs and Free Trade 101: China & France Experiment
To illustrate, let’s reference an example drawn from an op-ed by Princeton economist Burton Malkiel, author of the legendary finance book A Random Walk Down Wall Street.
Every country enjoys a comparative advantage in producing certain goods. For example, China historically benefits from low labor costs, making it a global manufacturing hub. Meanwhile, the U.S. leads in technological innovation, and countries like Brazil leverage vast land resources to dominate agricultural exports—such as being the world’s top coffee exporter. Let’s consider a simplified example using two countries: China and France, each with 100 labor hours available, and only able to produce T-shirts and wine.
China’s Output (see graphic above) – China’s comparative advantage in making more T-shirts than bottles of wine results in the following:
- 50 hours = 50 T-shirts
- 50 hours = 10 bottles of wine
France’s Output (see graphic above) – France’s comparative advantage in making more bottles of wine than T-shirts results in the following:
- 50 hours = 50 bottles of wine
- 50 hours = 20 T-shirts
Combined Total (China + France): 70 T-shirts + 60 bottles of wine = 130 total units of goods.
Example #2: Production Plan #2 (Each country specializes in their comparative advantage)
China’s Output (T-shirt specialization):
- 100 hours = 100 T-shirts
France’s Output (Wine specialization):
- 100 hours = 100 bottles of wine
Combined Total: 100 T-shirts + 100 bottles of wine = 200 total units of goods.
But here’s the challenge: the Chinese still want wine, and the French still want T-shirts. That’s where free trade comes in – see next example (graphic below).
Example #3: Production Plan #2 + Free Trade
Through free trade, each country can specialize in what they do best and then trade for other goods wanted or needed. If China trades 50 T-shirts for 50 bottles of wine with France, both countries end up with:
- China: 50 T-shirts + 50 bottles of wine
- France: 50 bottles of wine + 50 T-shirts
This plan produces 54% more total goods than the original production plan (200 vs. 130 – Example #1), with no increase in labor hours. China gets 300% more wine, and France gets 150% more T-shirts—a clear win-win.
Today’s Tariff Reality
In 2024, the U.S. trade deficit stood at $918 billion. President Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy aims to reduce this gap by incentivizing domestic manufacturing, increasing exports, and reducing imports. The challenge is that tariffs also raise prices for consumers and disrupt the benefits of free trade.
If the administration succeeds in establishing fairer rules for a level trading field, increasing government revenue, and narrowing the trade deficit, then history will likely view President Trump’s tariff policy favorably. But if tariffs lead to higher prices, inflation, and a weaker economy, the tariff policy may be judged as a costly misstep. The stock market, voters, and time will ultimately serve as the principal judges.
Looking ahead, two key dates are on the calendar:
- July 9 marks the end of the 90-day reciprocal tariff pause. Without new trade agreements, tariffs will spike on imports from many countries — raising costs for consumers.
- July 4 is not only Independence Day, but also the target date for Senate Republicans to pass the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, which packages several of President Trump’s top priorities: tax cuts, welfare reform, energy expansion, and border security. While the bill could stimulate growth, critics warn of its potential to balloon the national deficit.
Most Americans support the idea of fairer global trade. The question is whether aggressive tariffs across the globe are the right tool to achieve that goal — and whether trading partners will agree to new deals. Regardless of the outcome, this crash course in Tariffs & Free Trade 101 underscores the enduring value of specialization and free trade, even amid today’s turbulent tariff battles.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (June 2, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Turn Off TV – Emperor Media Has No Clothes!
Famous Danish author Hans Christian Andersen told a renowned fairy tale of an emperor who was conned into believing he is wearing an invisible suit. The crowd was too embarrassed to acknowledge his nakedness, so they pretend to not notice – until a young boy shouted, “The emperor has no clothes!”
Much like the fairy tale, when it comes to pointing out the many shortcomings of the financial media, I have no problem yelling, “The Emperor Media has no clothes!”
Media Spreads Fear and Misinformation
Mark Twain famously stated, “If you don’t read the newspaper, you’re uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you’re misinformed.” That sentiment rings especially true amid today’s swirl of alarming headlines. Here’s a sampling of recent media-induced worries:
- Global trade war caused by tariffs
- Declining value of the U.S. dollar
- Rising interest rates due to foreign debt sales
- Doubts over the U.S. dollar’s global reserve currency status
- Recession anxiety
- Stagflation fears
- Concerns about Executive Branch overreach
- Threats to remove the Federal Reserve Chairman
Is the sky falling? Is now the time to sell stocks, as the media often implies? Or are these risks being overstated and distorted by media outlets that chase monetary gains?
Issues are More Gray Than Black or White
Journalists – most of whom have little investing experience – like to authoritatively paint economic issues in black-or-white terms. But most reasonable people understand that these matters are complex, and the truth lies somewhere in the gray. To claim the media offers a balanced view of both the positives and negatives of complicated financial topics would be disingenuous.
I have been investing for over 30 years, and while I’ve never faced a global rebalancing of trade impacting trillions in economic activity, I’ve lived through far more uncertain times. Not only have my investments survived those volatile periods, but they have also thrived – repeatedly hitting new record highs.
F.U.D. Sells!
Does the media want you to believe the accurate, long-term stock market prosperity story? Hardly. As the saying goes, “If it bleeds, it leads.” Fear, uncertainty, and doubt (F.U.D.) sell more ads, subscriptions, newspapers, and magazines. The more blood, sweat, and anxiety in the headlines, the more money the media makes from distressed readers.
Behavioral finance pioneers, Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, showed that losses feel twice as painful as the pleasure of gains (see the Pleasure/Pain diagram below). Their Prospect Theory remains just as relevant today as when it was introduced in the late 1970s.
The greatest investor of all-time, Warren Buffett, once said, “Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful.” Unfortunately, the media pushes the opposite mantra: “sell fear and buy greed.” When markets fall, they sell Armageddon. When markets soar, they sell nirvana. During periods of over-optimism, they also exploit FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) by feasting on investors’ emotional cycle of excitement.
Reassuring long-term investors that everything will be okay—or that dips are buying opportunities—doesn’t generate as much media profits and ad sales. Fear does.
History Doesn’t Repeat Itself, But It Often Rhymes
Too many investors suffer from short-term thinking and goldfish-like memory. But as Mark Twain wisely stated, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but It often rhymes.” And history has shown that listening to the media during times of extreme market volatility often leads to poor decisions.
Let’s take a look at some key examples where media-driven fear was more misleading than helpful over the decades:
The Nifty Fifty Collapse (1973-1974)
In the early 1970s, long before the “Magnificent 7” stocks came to the fore, we had the “Nifty Fifty” stocks. These large-cap blue chip stocks traded at lofty P/E (Price-Earnings) ratios and were seen as invincible before they came crashing down in 1973-1974. Suffice it to say, the media headlines were horrific during this period.
Here is some context for this period:
- The U.S. was exiting the Vietnam War
- Economy was undergoing a major recession
- Watergate scandal and presidential resignation
- 9% unemployment
- The Arab Oil Embargo
- Surging inflation
The media’s response? Doom and gloom. Here’s an example of this sentiment from the Newsweek cover, “The Big Bad Bear,” published on September 9, 1974.
For those who sold in fear, the results were disastrous. The Dow bottomed shortly after the magazine was released and the market rebounded +61% in less than two years. Panic was the wrong move.
“The Death of Equities” (1979)
Inflation plagued the 1970s, and just before one of the longest bull markets in history, BusinessWeek declared “The Death of Equities” on its now-infamous September 1979 cover. Once again, the media acted as a perfect contrarian indicator with the Dow quadrupling over the next decade.
Dot-Com Bubble: “The Hottest Market Ever” (2000)
In March 2000, at the peak of the tech bubble, Money magazine ran a cover story: “How to Invest in the Hottest Market Ever.” Weeks later, the bubble burst. Suboptimal timing once again.
In that same timeframe, Newsweek captured the essence of FOMO with its July 5, 1999 cover: “Everyone Is Getting Rich but Me.” Right when risk was at its peak, most investors were blind to it and got sucked into the downdraft.
Source: NewsWeek
Financial Crisis – Depression 2.0 (2008)
In October 2008, the Time magazine cover encapsulated the zeitgeist of the period with a 1929 photo that included a line of desperate people waiting for food donations at a soup kitchen. Many feared a second Great Depression. Yet it was one of the best times in history to buy stocks with the Dow tripling over the next decade.
Brexit Panic (2016)
Media coverage around the U.K.’s Brexit vote to leave the EU (European Union) painted a picture of imminent recession and contagion. Instead, the media blitz surrounding Brexit turned out to be more molehill than mountain. Markets rebounded strongly and reached new highs in the subsequent months.
“Rocketman” and North Korea Missiles (2017)
Tensions flared in 2017 as North Korea tested missiles and President Trump threatened retaliation against dictator Kim Jong Un by bombing Pyongyang and “Rocket Man”. The media went into overdrive regarding the nuclear unease, but the market brushed it off and continued climbing +58% over the next few years.
COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)
With over 3 million deaths worldwide and a grinding halt to the global economy, markets initially fell roughly -35%. But as consumers stockpiled toilet paper, fast vaccine development and stimulus sparked a powerful rebound, with stocks finishing the year up +16%. Over the next two years, the Dow almost doubled.
Hostage to Our Lizard Brain
Why are we so susceptible to the sensationalist tendencies of the media? Evolution holds the answer. Humans’ DNA and brains are hard-wired to flee prey. The small almond-shaped tissue in our brain called the amygdala—or what author Seth Godin calls the “lizard brain”—evolved to respond instantly to danger. When headlines scream “crash” or “war,” our emotional brain overrides our logical one, which leads to poor long-term results. As Seth Godin explains, we’re wired to react, not reflect (Watch here). And the media knows it.
Headlines Change but the Long-Term Market Trend Doesn’t
Despite a barrage of negative headlines, stocks have remained resilient over the long run. The market has overcome wars, assassinations, currency crises, banking failures, terrorist attacks, pandemics, natural disasters, impeachments, tax hikes, recessions, restrictive Fed policies, debt downgrades, inflation, and yes, even tariffs (see chart below). Since WWII, we’ve had 12 recessions—each followed by a full recovery to new record highs. In baseball terms, the economy has batted a perfect 1.000 (12-for-12) with recession recoveries.
How to Survive the Avalanche of Media Headlines
Here are five key strategies:
- Turn off the TV: Don’t obsess over headlines. Emotional reactions result in poor decisions.
Buying high (greed) and selling low (fear) is not a recipe for long-term investment success.
- Diversify Your Investments: A well-balanced portfolio across asset classes helps reduce panic.
- Invest According to Time Horizon: Are you young? Assuming more risk and higher exposure to the stock market is generally fine. Are you near retirement? Don’t jeopardize your retirement goals – de-risk accordingly.
- Ignore Talking Heads: Most pundits don’t invest and their credibility is compromised by monetary conflicts of interest. It’s much more beneficial to follow seasoned professionals with real track records through multiple bull and bear markets.
- Avoid the Herd: Continually following the herd into the most popular investments often leads to underperformance. The grass is greener, and the food sources are more plentiful, off the beaten path trampled by the herd. Contrarian thinking works even though it can feel scary.
In the age of constant connectivity, headlines and the 24/7 news cycle are addictive. But if you’re tired of being a pawn in the media’s game, I invite you to join my fight by acknowledging that the Emperor Media has no clothes.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (May 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Rollercoaster Ride
Remember Liberation Day – the day reciprocal tariffs were announced? For those of us strapped daily into the financial market seat, it has felt like an endless rollercoaster ride since that eventful day. It may not seem like it, but reciprocal tariffs were unveiled a mere four weeks ago. Initially, after the April 2nd announcement, the stock market experienced a scary free fall. Then, after President Trump proclaimed a 90-day pause on the reciprocal tariffs and walked back other tariffs with exemptions, stock prices reversed course and catapulted higher to finish the month almost flat.
More specifically, the S&P 500 index slipped -0.8%, the NASDAQ index climbed +0.9% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell -3.2% in April.
Although the S&P 500 was temporarily down -21% from the February peak, the index has now bounced back and is down only -5% for the year (see chart below). Worries about a recession and tariff-induced inflation have not disappeared, but corporate profits remain strong, and we will get a fresh picture of the labor market on Friday when the monthly employment figures are released. If investors obtain some tariff clarity, trade deal announcements, and/or tax-cut legislation progress, the queasy stock market rollercoaster ride could turn to smooth sailing.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (May 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Animal Spirits to Animal Hibernation
Investor mood or sentiment can change rather quickly. Immediately after the 2024 presidential elections, positive animal spirits catapulted the stock market higher due to hopes of stimulating tax cuts and deregulation legislation. However, those warm and fuzzy feelings soured last month, as investor focus shifted to on-again, off-again tariff talks, and stagflation concerns, which have converted animal spirits into gloomy feelings of hibernation.
As a result, the advancing bull market took a breather and transformed into a weary bear during March. For the month, the S&P 500 (-5.8%), NASDAQ (-8.2%), and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-4.2%) all fell significantly in the wake of tariffs, inflation, and recession worries.
Lovely Liberation Day or Tariff Trouble?
Since the President took office in January, he has announced, reversed, and implemented tariffs across a wide range of countries and sectors, including China, Canada, Mexico, the EU, Colombia, Venezuela, steel, aluminum, oil, automobiles, digital services taxes, and more.
The day of reckoning begins on April 2nd, designated Liberation Day by the president. This is when the president and the White House officially announce global reciprocal tariffs on foreign countries in an attempt to reverse the nation’s large trade deficit (see chart below) and bring manufacturing back to the United States. For example, if Germany subsidizes BMW cars sold in the U.S. while simultaneously placing tariffs (i.e., additional taxes) on American Ford Explorers sold in Germany, the president wants to impose equivalent reciprocal tariffs on those same BMWs sold in the U.S. in an effort to level the trading playing field. On the surface, a $131 billion trade deficit sounds very significant, but when compared to a $30 trillion economy (Gross Domestic Product – GDP), this negative trade balance represents less than 0.5% of GDP – effectively a rounding error. I have previously written how tariffs represent more of a molehill than a mountain (see Tariff Sheriff), in part because consumer spending and services make up the vast majority of our country’s economic activity, whereas trade and manufacturing are relatively smaller segments.
Source: Trading Economics
Driving home the point that tariffs are more bark than bite, Senior White House trade and manufacturing counselor Peter Navarro recently stated the 2025 tariffs could add $700 billion annually to U.S. revenues, including $100 billion from the recently announced 25% auto tariffs. Many economists believe this collection estimate is too optimistic. However, even if this target is achievable, $700 billion only represents a measly 2% of overall GDP.
Tariffs = Recession or Stagflation?
With the recent stock market downdraft and growing concerns related to tariffs, some economists and pundits are raising the probability of a recession and the possibility of inflation accompanying an economic downturn (i.e., stagflation).
Economic data should clear some of the fog. Fresh employment numbers will be released this Friday, which should shine some light on the health of the economy. Irrespective of this month’s results, the most recent 4.1% unemployment rate (see chart below), though slightly higher over the last two years, does not strongly indicate a recession.
Source: Trading Economics
Other “hard” data, such as GDP, also suggest a slowing economy rather than a recession. For instance, a recent survey of 14 economists estimates the economy is growing at a paltry +0.3% rate in Q1 – 2025 versus +2.3% in Q4 – 2024. Data is continually changing, but if a looming recession were imminent, corporate earnings would likely be trending downward, not upwards, as evident in the chart below.
Source: Yardeni Research
Tariff Inflation Has Yet to Arrive
There is no doubt tariffs function as a tax hike on consumers because U.S. companies that pay the tariffs on imported goods are eventually forced to raise prices to maintain profit margins or limit margin degradation.
Nonetheless, inflation did not spike under President Trump’s first term. Even if the president’s new policies result in more aggressive tariff actions this go-around, inflation will likely remain in check due to the point mentioned earlier – imported goods represent a small percentage of overall consumer and business purchases.
Tariff implementation is just beginning, so only time will tell how pervasive inflation will become. However, what we do know now is that inflation has declined dramatically over the last couple of years and has not yet spiked (see Consumer Price Index chart below).
Source: Calafia Beach Pundit
Where Could I Be Wrong?
I have explained how some of the lagging “hard” data does not signal recession or stagflation, but what could I be missing? For starters, some of the leading “soft” data (e.g., surveys) indicate various cracks in the economic foundation are forming. Take the recent Consumer Confidence data (see chart below), which has weakened dramatically from pre-COVID and even post-COVID levels.
Source: Trading Economics
It’s not just consumers who are feeling uneasy about the economic environment; businesses are as well. Another soft data point flashing red is the NFIB Small Business Uncertainty index, which recently reported its second-highest reading in 48 years (see chart below). Even if my argument that tariffs are too small to materially impact the economy holds, if the psychological effects of tariff uncertainty paralyzes consumer and business economic activity to a standstill, then tariffs could indeed become a substantial factor.
Source: National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)
What Comes Next After Liberation Day?
Liberation Day is unlikely to trigger an immediate and sustained V-shaped recovery in the stock market because international trading partners will be forced to announce retaliatory tariffs in response to President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, potentially leading to additional reactionary tariffs by the U.S.
Additionally, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2nd will likely serve as a starting point for subsequent negotiations with trading partners. Without a comprehensive resolution, investor sentiment will likely remain somewhat unresolved and unsettled. Regardless of your views on the size and impact of tariffs, Liberation Day will at least bring some clarity and reduce the uncertainty surrounding the current murky and chaotic environment.
The multi-year bull market continued its charge after the presidential election, but investor sentiment has weakened the bull run due to tariff uncertainty. In response, the excited bull has temporarily turned into a sleepy bear. Depending on how these tariff events unfold, we will soon find out whether Liberation Day will awaken the bear to hunt for bulls or send it into deep hibernation.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (April 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in F or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Par for the Course
Stocks have been in a multi-year bull market, but just as investors cannot earn positive returns every month, golfers also cannot achieve a hole-in-one or birdie on every hole, either. A challenging performance is exactly what happened last month when stocks recorded a bogey on the scorecard.
More specifically, this is how far out-of-bounds the major indexes were last month:
- S&P 500: -1.4%
- Dow Jones Industrial Average -1.6%
- NASDAQ: -4.0%
Technology stocks and the Magnificent 7 stocks felt the largest brunt of the force last month as tariffs and the impact of Chinese AI (Artificial Intelligence) competition gave investors heartburn as they digested the information (see New Year, New AI ERA & New Tariff Sheriff).
Tariffs – More Molehill Than Mountain
As mentioned, a large part of last month’s volatility can be explained by the policy uncertainty surrounding the impending tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico. Despite the absence of new tariffs being implemented, in an attempt to lock in cheaper imported goods, U.S. corporations and consumers have been stockpiling foreign goods before prices move higher due to tariffs. The 25% proposed tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods are set to be applied as soon as March 4th. A flat 25% tariff on imported steel and aluminum products is expected to begin on March 12th – these particular tariffs are expected to have a disproportionately negative impact on the automotive industry.
Regarding other proposed reciprocal trade agreements, the White House’s analysis on tariffs for all other countries (beyond China, Canada, and Mexico) is expected to arrive on the president’s desk on April 2nd.
All these proposed changes are having an immediate economic impact whether intended or not. Not only are consumers buying more overseas products now, as they brace for higher prices, but businesses are also shifting supply chains to countries outside of China, Canada, and Mexico, in hopes of finding temporary tariff loopholes.
The bottom-line is our country’s imports have been spiking up recently, especially in the first quarter. Imports by definition subtract from America’s economic activity, so if businesses and consumers are rationally stockpiling foreign goods before prices go up from tariffs, investors should not be surprised that GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth is set to go negative in the first quarter (-1.5%), according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
This short-term spike in foreign product purchases should be temporary until the tariffs are officially put in place. Subsequently, demand for relatively cheaper U.S. goods should rise because foreign goods will be pricier. In other words, buyers may begin purchasing more American-made t-shirts on Amazon because those shirts could be cheaper than the Chinese-made t-shirts after the additional tariffs commence on China.
How large are these overall tariffs? When it comes to Mexico and Canada, the size of these countries’ imports is estimated at $918 billion (see the 2023 import breakdown below for the two countries). On the surface, this sounds like a very large number, and it is. However, if you consider the size of the U.S. GDP ($29.4 trillion), these tariffs will mathematically have less than a 1% impact on the direction of our country’s economic activity.
However, if demand for American products goes up after the tariffs begin, as mentioned above, then it is perfectly logical to expect the drag from imports can be diminished or possibly completely reversed, if consumers decide to buy more American goods.
Source: Visual Capitalist
Also worth noting, as I documented last month in my Investing Caffeine blog, imports only account for 13.9% of our country’s economic activity (see New Tariff Sheriff). So, while tariffs make for great scary headlines, the reality of the numbers paints a different picture. Overall, the uncertainty surrounding the discussion of tariffs is having a much larger economic impact than the actual tariffs themselves. In other words, what we are discussing is more molehill than mountain. We saw this same movie before during the administration’s first-term when tariffs did not crater the economy into recession or create disproportionately high inflation.
War at the White House
A geopolitical soap opera played out on global television last Friday during a meeting between Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Trump in the Oval Office. The meeting was designed to be a celebratory signing of a minerals deal in which the U.S. would gain access to strategically important Ukrainian rare earth metals in exchange for continued U.S. aid and military support. A signed deal would increase the probability of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine dramatically. What actually happened was a war of words at the White House, which resulted in Zelensky getting kicked out of the White House with no signed deal.
Both sides have economic and strategic incentives to reengage in peace and mineral deal negotiations, but if the U.S.-Ukraine relationship totally crumbles, Europe and the other NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) countries will need to pick up the slack in their military and economic aid to Ukraine. Regardless, increased European support is required to stave off a broader incursion by Russia and Vladimir Putin into a wider portion of Europe.
Tariffs, the Russia-Ukraine war, and AI issues may have heightened investor anxiety last month, but long-term investors understand that annual -5% and -10% corrections in the equity markets are considered par for the course. In fact, over the last 12 months, the S&P 500 index has declined -5% five times, and -10% one time, yet the stock market is still up +16% on a trailing 12-month basis (see chart below).
Source: Trading Economics
Financial markets end up in the rough plenty of the time, which often results in performance scorecard bogeys. However, long-term investors and Sidoxia Capital Management clients have won more often than not because the benefits of American capitalism have created many more birdies and pars over time.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (March 3, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in META, NVDA, certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in BABA or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
New Year, New AI Era & New Tariff Sheriff
The first month of 2025 started with a bang when newly-inaugurated President Donald Trump announced a groundbreaking AI (artificial intelligence) program led by business titan thought leaders called Stargate, which promises to spend a half trillion dollars on AI data center infrastructure projects and create hundreds of thousands of jobs. Just one week later, a wet blanket was placed on the Stargate euphoria when a Chinese AI upstart announced a technological breakthrough. Stocks moved lower on the last day of the month when Trump added insult to injury by confirming 25% Mexican/Canadian tariffs and 10% additional Chinese tariffs would be implemented immediately.
Regardless, positive economic and corporate data coupled with other pro-business fiscal policies (e.g., deregulation and lower proposed taxes) allowed the financial markets to finish the month with respectable gains. More specifically, the S&P 500 surged higher by +2.7%; the NASDAQ +1.6%; and the Dow Jones Industrial Average +4.7%.
DeepSeek = Deep AI Trouble?
Ever since OpenAI launched its ChatGPT language model (LLM) at the end of 2022, the global AI gold rush began. Just as the United States appeared to be dominating the AI race to global superiority, a bombshell was recently released, when a new Chinese AI upstart, DeepSeek, released a white paper claiming the company’s R1 large language model (LLM) rivaled competitors’ LLMs like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Meta’s Llama (META), Anthropic’s Claude, and Alibaba’s Qwen (BABA) for a small fraction of the price spent by DeepSeek’s American rivals. The “DeepSeek Freak” caused a chain reaction of selling across a wide swath of companies (including NVIDIA Corp – NVDA) that have benefitted from hundreds of billions in AI infrastructure spending. The fear that Chinese AI competition may leapfrog U.S. companies, and potentially dramatically reduce AI-related capital expenditures caused the NASDAQ to almost fall -2% last week, and AI juggernaut NVIDIA shed more than a half trillion dollars in the company’s market value in a single day. Overall, U.S. stocks lost more than a trillion dollars in value on the day of the DeepSeek Freak unveiling.
Although investors were initially panicked by the DeepSeek revelations, not all of the Chinese claims have been substantiated. In fact, a just-released report by SemiAnalysis, a semiconductor research and consulting firm, states that DeepSeek’s costs for its R1 LLM likely exceed $500 million, much higher than the $6 million training costs stated in DeepSeek’s initial pronouncement.
Source: NBC News
New Tariff Sheriff in Town
While many investors were hoping for a delay in the implementation of President Trump’s tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China, Trump decided to move full steam ahead with a February 1st start date. In 2023, Mexico was the U.S.’s largest trade partner and Canada was the second largest. These Mexican and Canadian tariffs are very broad based and impact many different industries, including autos, agricultural products, and crude oil. You can see the extent of the impact in the graphic below graphic below.
Source: VisualCapitalist.com
But what does this mean for the economy? In short, it will mean higher prices for U.S. consumers and businesses. The Tax Foundation, an 85-year-old, non-partisan, tax policy non-profit attempted to quantify some of the potential impacts from the proposed tariffs. The bottom-line findings from the Tax Foundation were that tariffs would “shrink economic output by -0.4% and increase taxes by $1.2 trillion between 2025 and 2034 on a conventional basis, amounting to an average tax increase of more than $830 per US household in 2025.” Please, also see table below (Scenario 2).
Source: Tax Foundation
In addition to American consumers having to pay higher taxes and prices for tariffed import products, there will be an estimated -344,000 jobs lost and there could be unintended consequences from retaliatory tariffs imposed on U.S. exports (i.e., our goods shipped internationally will be priced uncompetitively). In fact, Canada and Mexico just jointly announced tit-for-tat tariffs on U.S. goods and services, which will hurt these U.S. sales abroad.
With all of that said, the bark of the 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, along with the 10% in additional tariffs on China could be worse than the actual bite. Especially, if Trump uses these tariffs successfully as a negotiating tool and provides foreign countries with significant exemptions.
It’s also important to keep the size of these tariffs in context. Imports of foreign good and services only represented 13.9% of the Unted States’ Gross Domestic Product in 2023. Of that small percentage of imports, Mexico, Canada, and China only represent a fraction of that. It’s true that imports subtract from our country’s economic activity, but even if tariffs on foreign goods lead to the consumption of more American manufactured products, those benefits will be somewhat offset by higher inflated prices that will pinch consumer wallets. The new year marks an exciting new era of AI and global trade, but with that comes many new threats and opportunities. Throughout our 17-year history at Sidoxia Capital Management, we have successfully navigated these pivot points, and we are excited about effectively managing through this current transitional period.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (February 3, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in META, NVDA, certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in BABA or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Chinese Checkers or Chess?
There’s been a high stakes economic game of trade going on between the United States and China, but it’s unclear what actual game is being played or what the rules are? Is it Chinese checkers, chess, or some other game?
Currently, the rules of the U.S.-China trade war game are continually changing. Most recently, the U.S. has implemented 15% in added tariffs (on approximately $125 billion in Chinese consumer imports) on September 1st. The president and his administration appreciate the significance of trade negotiations, especially as it relates to his second term reelection campaign, which is beginning to swing into full gear. However, game enthusiasts also understand you can’t win or truly play a game, if you don’t know the rules? In that same vein, investors have been confused about the U.S.-China trade game as the president’s Twitter account has been blowing up with tariff threats and trade discussion updates. As a negotiating tactic, the current unpredictable trade talks spearheaded by the Trump administration have been keeping investors guessing whether there will be a successful deal payoff. Until then, market participants have been sitting on the sidelines watching the stock market volatility unfold, one tweet at a time.
Here’s what the president has planned for other tariffs:
- October 1: Tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese goods rise to 30%.
- November 17: Europe auto tariff deadline.
- December 15: 15% tariffs on $160 billion in Chinese goods.
This uncertain game translated into all the major stock market averages vacillating to an eventual decline last month, with a price chart resembling a cardiogram. More specifically, after bouncing around wildly, the S&P 500 decreased -1.8% last month (see chart below), the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped -1.7%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq fell -2.6%.
Politically, there is bipartisan support to establish new trade rules and there is acknowledgement that China has been cheating and breaking trade rules for decades. The consensus among most constituencies is especially clear as it relates to Chinese theft of our intellectual property, forced technology transfer, and barriers for U.S. companies to invest in China.
Beyond trade talks, China has been stirring the geopolitical pot through its involvement in the political instability occurring in Hong Kong, which is a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China. For over five months Hong Kong has had to deal with mass demonstration and clashes with police primarily over a proposed extradition bill that Hong Kong people fear would give mainland China control and jurisdiction over the region. Time will tell whether the protests will allow Hong Kong to remain relatively independent, or the Chinese Communist party will eventually lose patience and use an authoritarian response to the protesters.
Inverted Yield Curve: Fed No Longer Slamming Breaks in Front of Feared Recession
Another issue contributing to recent financial market volatility has been the so-called “inverted yield curve.” Typically, an economic recession has been caused by the Federal Reserve slamming the breaks on an overheated economy by raising short-term interest rates (Federal Funds target rate). Historically, as short-term rates rise and increase borrowing costs (i.e., slow down economic activity), long-term interest rates eventually fall amid expected weak economic activity. When declining long-term interest rates fall below short-term interest rates…voila, you have an inverted yield curve. Why is this scary? Ever since World War II, history has informed us that whenever this phenomenon has occurred, this dynamic has been a great predictor for a looming recession.
What’s different this time? Unlike the past, is it possible the next recession can be averted or delayed? One major difference is the explosion in negative interest rate yielding bonds now reaching $17 trillion.
Yes, you read that correctly, investors are lining up in droves for guaranteed losses – if these bonds are held until maturity. This widespread perception as a move to perceived safety has not protected the U.S. from the global rate anchor sinking our long-term interest rates. United States interest rates have not turned negative (yet?), but rates have fallen by more than half over the last 10 months from +3.24% to +1.51% on the 10-Year Treasury Note. Will this stimulate businesses to borrow and consumers to buy homes (i.e., through lower cost mortgages), or are these negative rates a sign of a massive global slowdown? The debate continues, but in the meantime, I’m going to take advantage of a 0%-interest rate loan to buy me an 85″ big screen television for my new home!
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (September 3, 2019). Subscribe on the right side of the page for the complete text.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions and certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
January a Ball After Year-End Fall
Investors were cheerfully dancing last month after the stock market posted its best January in 30 years and the best monthly performance since October 2015 (see chart below). More specifically, the S&P 500 index started the year by catapulting +7.9% higher (the best January since 1987), and the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 1,672 points to 25,000, or +7.2%. But over the last few months there has been plenty of heartburn and volatility. The December so-called Santa Claus rally did not occur until a large pre-Christmas pullback. From the September record high, stocks temporarily fell about -20% before the recent jolly +15% post-Christmas rebound.
Source: FactSet via The Wall Street Journal
Although investors have been gleefully boogying on the short-run financial dance floor, there have been plenty of issues causing uncomfortable blisters. At the top of the list is China-U.S. trade. The world is eagerly watching the two largest global economic powerhouses as they continue to delicately dance through trade negotiations. Even though neither country has slipped or fallen since the 90-day trade truce, which began on December 1 in Buenos Aires, the stakes remain high. If an agreement is not reached by March 2, tariffs on imported Chinese goods would increase to 25% from 10% on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods, thereby raising prices for U.S. consumers and potentially leading to further retaliatory responses from Beijing.
When it comes to the subjects of intellectual property protection and forced technology transfers of American companies doing business in China, President Xi Jinping has been uncomfortably stepping on President Donald Trump’s toes. Nothing has been formally finalized, however Chinese officials have signaled they are willing to make some structural reforms relating to these thorny issues and have also expressed a willingness to narrow the trade deficit with our country by purchasing more of our exports. Besides procuring more American energy goods, the Chinese have also committed to buy 5,000,000 tons of our country’s soybeans to feed China’s hungry population of 1.4 billion people.
Reaching a trade settlement is important for both countries, especially in light of the slowing Chinese economy (see chart below) and the dissipating stimulus benefits of the 2018 U.S. tax cuts. Slowing growth in China has implications beyond our borders as witnessed by slowing growth in Europe as evidenced by protests we have seen in France and the contraction of German manufacturing (the first time in over four years). Failed Brexit talks of the U.K. potentially leaving the European Union could add fuel to the global slowdown fire if an agreement cannot be reached by the March 29th deadline in a couple months.
Source: Wind via The Wall Street Journal
While the temporary halt to the longest partial federal government shutdown in history (35 days) has brought some short-term relief to the 800,000 government workers/contractors who did not receive pay, the political standoff over border security may last longer than expected, which may further dampen U.S. economic activity and growth. Whether the hot-button issue of border wall funding is resolved by February 15th will determine if another shutdown is in the cards.
Despite China trade negotiations and the government shutdown deadlock placing a cloud over financial markets, brighter skies have begun to emerge in other areas. First and foremost has been the positive shift in positioning by the Federal Reserve as it relates to monetary policy. Not only has Jay Powell (Fed Chairman) communicated a clear signal of being “patient” on future interest rate target increases, but he has also taken the Fed off of “autopilot” as it relates to shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet – a process that can hinder economic growth. Combined, these shifts in strategy by the Fed have been enthusiastically received by investors, which has been a large contributor to the +15% rebound in stock prices since the December lows. Thanks to this change in stance, the inverted yield curve bogeyman that typically precedes post-World War II recessions has been held at bay as evidenced by the steepening yield curve (see chart below).
Source: Calafia Beach Pundit
Other areas of strength include the recent employment data, which showed 304,000 jobs added in January, the 100th consecutive month of increased employment. Fears of an imminent recession that penetrated psyches in the fourth quarter have abated significantly in January in part because of the notable strength seen in 4th quarter corporate profits, which so far have increased by +12% from last year, according to FactSet. The strength and rebound in overall commodity prices, including oil, seem to indicate any potential looming recession is likely further out in time than emotionally feared.
Source: Calafia Beach Pundit
As the chart above shows, over the last four years, spikes in fear (red line) have represented beneficial buying opportunities of stocks (blue line). The pace of gains in January is just as unsustainable as the pace of fourth-quarter losses were in stock prices. Uncertainties may remain on trade, shutdowns, geopolitics, and other issues but don’t throw away your investing dance shoes quite yet…the ball and music experienced last month could continue for a longer than expected period of time.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (February 1, 2018). Subscribe on the right side of the page for the complete text.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions and certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
Investing Caffeine 
