Posts filed under ‘Politics’
As We Give Thanks, AI and Mag 7 Take Cash to the Bank
Market volatility resurfaced last month as speculation intensified over whether an AI bubble may be forming—and potentially bursting. Yet despite the jitters, equity markets remain solidly positive for the year (S&P 500 +16.5%, NASDAQ +21.0%, Dow +12.2%) – see S&P 500 chart below. A significant portion of the gains have been powered in large part by ongoing strength in the Magnificent 7. Standouts such as NVIDIA (+31.8%) and Alphabet (+68.1%) have been instrumental in carrying the broader indices higher.
Even with these sizable year-to-date gains, memories of the 2000 Tech Bubble and 2008 Financial Crisis resurfaced and prompted investors to temporarily tap the brakes. Mid-month, the NASDAQ retreated roughly -9% from its October peak. After a month-end bounce, the S&P 500 finished essentially flat (+0.1%), the NASDAQ slipped -1.5%, and the Dow eked out a +0.3% increase.
OpenAI and the $1.4 Trillion Question
At the center of the AI controversy sits OpenAI, parent of the three-year-old technology toddler, ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), which now boasts more than 800 million global users (see chart below). The company reportedly runs at a $20 billion annual revenue pace, yet faces difficult questions about how it intends to fund its staggering $1.4 trillion AI infrastructure commitments.
Those concerns came to a head when tech investor Brad Gerstner pressed CEO Sam Altman on his podcast last month. Instead of answering how OpenAI plans to underwrite such an enormous buildout, Altman childishly shot back defensively:
“If you want to sell your shares, I’ll find you a buyer.” (See clip here — or full interview here)
Source: Digital Information World
OpenAI is a key player, but just one component in the vast—and rapidly expanding—web of global AI infrastructure. Gartner, a global research and advisory firm, forecasts $2 trillion of AI investment in 2026, while NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang recently said:
“Over the next five years, we’re going to scale into… effectively a $3 to $4 trillion AI infrastructure opportunity.”
These provocative “Is this a bubble?” questions make for great headlines, but to truly evaluate AI sustainability, it’s wise to follow the classic Watergate guidance from of All the President’s Men character, Deep Throat (FBI Associate Director, Mark Felt), who tells journalist Bob Woodward to “follow the money,” if he wants to get to the bottom of the Watergate scandal.
The same principle applies to investors who follow the money – the picture looks very different from past bubbles.
Forget Pets.com—Today’s AI Buildout Is Being Funded by Cash-Rich Titans
Unlike the flimsy, profitless internet startups of the late 1990s—companies that raised billions based on “eyeballs” and cocktail-napkin business plans—the current AI buildout is being financed largely by profitable cash-generating giants.
Yes, some firms like Oracle (ORCL) are leaning on debt financing for data-center expansion. But the overwhelming majority of AI capex is being funded by customers and by the cash flow of the Magnificent 7, a group with the financial firepower to sustain multi-year spending without relying heavily on capital markets.
This dynamic alone separates today’s environment from classic bubble conditions.
Do the Magnificent 7 Really Deserve a $22 Trillion Valuation?
The Mag 7 represent only 1% of S&P 500 constituents yet account for a massive 35% of the index’s market value. That concentration understandably raises eyebrows, evoking historical parallels to the “Nifty Fifty” of the 1970s or the “Four Horsemen” of the 1990s.
But headline concentration can be misleading—because the fundamentals tell a very different story. Here are some of the major disparities:
1.) Mag 7 Share of Profits Matches Their Share of Market Value: The Mag 7 collectively contribute $22 trillion of the S&P 500’s $58 trillion total value (below). Said differently, the market values and weightings of the Mag 7 equate to about $22 trillion and 37% of the S&P 500, respectively:
· Nvidia Corp: $4.3T & 7.0%
· Apple Inc.: $4.1 T & 6.7%
· Alphabet Inc.: $3.9 T & 6.3%
· Microsoft Corp.: $3.7 T & 5.9%
· Amazon.com Inc.: $2.5 T & 4.0%
· Meta Platforms Inc.: $1.6T & 2.6%
· Tesla Inc.: $1.4T & 2.3%
· TOTAL: $22T / 37%
Source: Slickcharts
Conveniently (and importantly), the Mag 7’s roughly $747 billion in annual cash flow (see table below) is a good proxy for their profit contribution to the $2 trillion in S&P profits.
Source: SEC Filings & MarketSurge
The $747 billion in Mag 7 cash flows divided by the $2 trillion in S&P 500 coincidentally also equates to 37% ($747B/$2T).
These calculations of the Mag 7 are not bubble math—these calculation comparisons are rational math. Arguments could be made that Mag 7 market values are actually undervalued (not in bubble territory) and should appreciate to a higher percentage of the S&P 500 weightings because these 7 stocks are growing sales and profits faster than compared to the other “absentee” 493 stocks in the index.
2.) Mag 7 are Swimming in Cash: That $747 billion in annual cash flow is on track to hit a jaw-dropping $1 trillion, giving these firms ample capital to fund AI buildouts without substantially accessing the equity or credit markets. The ability to self-fund a multi-trillion-dollar infrastructure expansion is the opposite of bubble behavior.
3.) Valuations Are Elevated—but Far from Bubble Territory: During the 2000 Tech Bubble, many leading tech names traded at 100x+ earnings (See also: Rational or Irrational Exuberance. Today, the Mag 7 trade at a median forward P/E around 30x. Expensive? Historically, yes, versus long-term averages, but nowhere near historical extremes. Relative to growth, profitability, and cash flow, valuations are far more grounded today than during prior manias.
The bottom line is there is plenty to be thankful for and bubble fears are overstated. Despite pockets of AI froth, the underlying economic engine powering AI adoption is real, profitable, and well-capitalized. When investors follow the money, they discover:
· The Mag 7 generate over one-third of S&P 500 profits
· They generate and hold hundreds of billions in cash
· They largely fund their own AI capital expenditures
· Valuations remain far below bubble-era extremes
Investors have a lot to be thankful for. And while volatility will likely continue, the ingredients for a classic, catastrophic AI bubble are noticeably absent. For disciplined, long-term investing strategies like those employed at Sidoxia Capital Management, this environment still offers abundant opportunity—without the need to fear a pricked AI balloon anytime soon.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (Dec. 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, META, TSLA, and certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in ORCL or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
Markets Surge Higher Despite Shutdown Anxiety Fire
Wars rage on in Ukraine and Gaza, political violence is on the rise at home, tariff-driven inflation remains debated, and anxiety over a looming government shutdown is intensifying. On the surface, this might sound like the perfect recipe for a market meltdown. But Wall Street seems unfazed. In fact, U.S. equities pushed to new record highs again this month, continuing the bull market’s relentless advance in the face of these concerns.
Here is a market performance snapshot for the month:
- S&P 500: +3.5% (+13.7% year-to-date)
- Dow Jones Industrial Average: +1.9% (+9.1% year-to-date)
- NASDAQ Composite: +5.6% (+17.3% year-to-date)
What’s fueling the optimism?
• A Strong Economy: The economy just produced a final +3.8% GDP growth for the 2nd quarter, and the Atlanta Federal Reserve is forecasting an even stronger economy for the 3rd quarter of +3.9% (see below).
• Robust Corporate Earnings: S&P 500 corporate profits surged by +11.8% in the 2nd quarter and consensus estimates call for 3rd quarter growth of +7.9%. Historically, CEOs tend to set conservative forecasts, therefore actual results often exceed low-bar expectations. Therefore, it’s very possible that Q3 earnings growth could achieve double-digit growth levels once again.
• A.I. Drive Still Alive: With trillions of dollars in A.I. spending plans already announced, hungry investors once again gobbled up A.I. tech stocks last month. For instance, Oracle Corp’s (ORCL) stock jumped +24% for the month in large part driven by a $317 billion increase in backlog orders during the company’s first fiscal quarter. Reportedly, the majority of the massive increase in orders came from one customer, OpenAI – the brains behind the A.I. juggernaut, ChatGPT. The rise in Oracle’s share price temporarily propelled CEO Larry Ellison past Tesla’s (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk as the world’s richest person, before markets began critically questioning whether OpenAI’s CEO (Sam Altman) can ultimately fund the hundreds of billions of dollars in Oracle commitments.
Source: Atlanta Federal Reserve
Shutdown Jitter History
Market anxiety has shifted from a hypothetical government shutdown nightmare to a scary reality, given the funding deadlines have already lapsed. Many investors are asking what this means for stocks. Fortunately, government shutdowns are nothing new. Our country has flourished over the last 50 years despite experiencing around two dozen shutdowns, many of which only lasted a few hours, a few days, or a few weeks. According to Kiplinger, since the 1970s, the stock market has averaged a +0.3% return during shutdown periods (see chart below).
Source: Kiplinger
In fact, the longest shutdown on record occurred most recently from December 2018 to January 2019 (35 days during President Trump’s first term) and resulted in a sharp +10% gain (see chart below).
Source: Kiplinger / YCharts
The partisan finger-pointing will continue, but history suggests that shutdowns are short-term noise with little bearing on long-term market direction. Long-term investors understand there is never a shortage of concerns during bad times (e.g., potential recessions, job losses, credit defaults, bankruptcies, etc.), or good times as well (e.g. fear of inflation, restrictive monetary policy, politics, etc.). Turning off the TV is often the best course of action (see also – Turn Off the TV).
What’s Next? Looking Ahead After more than 30 years of investing—including weathering the dot-com tech sense of purpose collapse in 2000—I’ve learned that markets always have a tendency of climbing a wall of worry, so it’s better to not react emotionally to daily news headlines. Rather, it’s better for investors to stay focused on those market leading, innovative companies and concentrate on those sectors experiencing long-term secular trends.
As we enter Q4 and head toward 2026, A.I. remains the defining theme. Since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, the S&P 500 has surged +24% in 2023, +23% in 2024, and +14% so far in 2025. Unfortunately, trees do not grow to the sky forever.
At Sidoxia Capital Management, we understand that valuations currently are stretched on a historic basis and that markets never move in a straight line. As a result, a correction at some point in stock prices should not come as a surprise to anyone. Nevertheless, whether you’re bullish on the productivity gains from large language models (LLMs) or skeptical of over-investment and hype, one thing is clear: A.I. is here to stay, and it doesn’t matter if you believe the government shutdown flames will grow into an inferno or fizzle out in smoke, which is usually the case.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (October 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in ORCL, TSLA, and certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
A.I. Field of Dreams
In the 1989 Academy Award–nominated film Field of Dreams, the lead character Ray Kinsella (played by Kevin Costner) hears a mysterious voice whisper, “If you build it, he will come.” Acting on blind faith, Ray builds a baseball diamond in the middle of his Iowa cornfield, risking financial ruin. Against all logic, the field draws a flood of visitors.
Today, a similar “field of dreams” is being built—not with corn, but with data centers. Instead of baseball players, it is artificial intelligence (AI) models, applications, and users who are coming.
The Market’s AI Momentum
The AI boom has already reshaped markets with all three benchmarks hitting record highs. Last month, the S&P 500 climbed +1.9%, while the NASDAQ rose +1.6% and Dow Jones Industrial Average surged +3.2%. Year to date, the indexes are up +10%, +11%, and +7%, respectively.
Behind this surge lies an unprecedented wave of AI infrastructure investment. Hyperscalers—Amazon.com (AMZN), Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Google-Alphabet (GOOGL), Meta Platforms (META), and others—are pouring hundreds of billions into AI, much of it flowing directly to NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA), the undisputed leader in GPUs (Graphic Processing Units) powering the world’s AI engines. How large is the spending? NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang estimates $3 trillion to $4 trillion will be spent this decade to fuel the AI revolution.
Source: Visual Capitalist
The Scale of AI’s Buildout
To put this into perspective:
- Amazon is projected to spend over $100 billion in 2025 alone, more than its cumulative capital expenditures from 2000–2020 combined.
Meta is constructing its $10 billion+ Hyperion data center in Louisiana—a sprawling 4 million sq. ft. complex across 2,250 acres, powered by a $4 billion natural gas plant. The footprint is so gargantuan it could cover much of Manhattan (see graphic below).
- xAI’s Colossus, a 750,000 sq. ft. data center in Memphis, Tennessee was completed in just 122 days—equivalent to building 418 homes in half the time it normally takes to construct one house (see slide below).
Source: BOND (Global Technology Investment Firm)
This breakneck pace of spending underscores the urgency and competitive pressure driving the global AI arms race.
The Origin of the AI Floodgates Opening
The spark was lit on November 30, 2022, when OpenAI released its LLM (large language model) called ChatGPT. Within two months, it amassed 100 million users.
Today, ChatGPT’s metrics have blasted much higher (see slide below):
- 800 million weekly active users
- 20 million paid subscribers
- $3.7 billion in revenue (as of April 2025)
Source: BOND (Global Technology Investment Firm)
But OpenAI is far from alone. Google (Gemini), xAI (Grok), Anthropic (Claude), Meta (LLaMA), Amazon (Titan), Perplexity, and DeepSeek are all competing with their own LLMs. In total, over 1 million machine learning models now exist (see slide below) — each requiring costly compute power and pricey data centers.
Source: BOND (Global Technology Investment Firm)
Bubble or Productivity Breakthrough?
With trillions flowing into AI, a natural question arises: Is this a bubble?
Even OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admits we’re in an AI bubble :
“When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth…Someone is going to lose a phenomenal amount of money… and a lot of people are going to make a phenomenal amount of money.”
Both realities can be true:
- Yes, hyperscalers are spending like “drunken sailors.”
- Yes, AI demand and productivity benefits are real and growing exponentially.
Consider the trajectory of global cloud revenues: from nearly $0 a decade ago to $300 billion today—a +37% CAGR (see chart below).
Source: BOND (Global Technology Investment Firm)
And the primary reason for cloud growth can be attributed to AI productivity benefits. A recent SAP survey found that workers using AI save nearly one hour per day on average. That’s transformative for companies: higher productivity without needing proportional hiring.
AI Use Cases Expanding Aggressively
AI’s applications now span nearly every sector (see slide below):
- Technology – software engineering, code generation
- Customer Service & Marketing – customer support and call centers
- Transportation – autonomous vehicles and logistics
- Healthcare – drug discovery and development
- Supply Chains – precision manufacturing and optimization
- Automation – multi-purpose robotics
- Cybersecurity – threat detection and prevention
- Education – personalized lessons and curriculums
- Energy – grid optimization and demand forecasting
Source: BOND (Global Technology Investment Firm)
The New Field of Dreams
Throughout history, every great leap—printing press, steam engine, electricity, internet—has required massive upfront investment before the payoff arrived. AI is following the same path. Today, we are in the midst of building a new AI Field of Dreams. However, now, the data centers are the new baseball fields. And as with Ray Kinsella’s diamond, the masses are indeed coming.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (August 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in GOOGL, META, AMZN, MSFT, NVDA, and certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in SAP or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
Trade & OBBB Deals Sealed, Fed Dread, and AI/Meme Dreams
As the stock market reached new all-time highs, investors had plenty to juggle—both in Washington, D.C., and on Wall Street. The S&P 500 climbed +2.2%, the NASDAQ surged +3.7%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average edged higher by +0.1% for the month.
The One Big Beautiful Bill
What has fueled the rally? A major catalyst was President Trump’s signing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB) on July 4th. The nearly 900-page legislation spans a broad range of economic issues including tax reform, healthcare, energy policy, and national security.
According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the combined impact of tax cuts, new spending, and spending reductions will result in a net cost of $3.4 trillion over 10 years (see chart above). Supporters of the bill argue that this projection underestimates the long-term stimulative effects of tax relief and strategic investments. Whether the deficit widens as the CBO projects, or narrows thanks to a stronger, growing economy, remains to be seen.
Trade Deals Sealed
Since Liberation Day on April 2nd, trade negotiations have progressed unevenly. The administration’s reciprocal tariff hikes were paused through August 1st to allow final agreements to be reached. Following months of tough rhetoric, multiple major trading partners ultimately signed deals before the deadline—including the European Union, Japan, the United Kingdom, Vietnam, and South Korea—thereby avoiding punitive tariffs.
Talks with our two key trading partners, Mexico and Canada, remain ongoing. While Mexico was granted a 90-day extension amid constructive dialogue, Trump slapped a 35% tariff on Canada (from 25%) due to what the White house said was “continued inaction and retaliation.” The tariff pause with China stops on August 12th.
Here’s a list of the new country tariffs released by the president late yesterday: CLICK HERE
Regardless of all the tariff uncertainty, investor sentiment improved last month as the terms of the signed deals were significantly milder than originally feared.
Adding to the optimism:
- Core inflation in June remained modest at 2.8% (Reuters), and
- Tariff revenues collected through July reached $126 billion, beating initial estimates (Politico) – see chart below. Strategist Ed Yardeni forecasts that 2025 tariff revenues could surge to between $400 billion and $500 billion (Barron’s).
Source: Politico
Fed Dread
Of course, when it comes to financial markets, everything can’t just be rainbows and unicorns without something for investors to worry about—and this month, a key concern remains Federal Reserve policy. Critics, including the president, argue that interest rates are too high, with the Federal Funds Rate currently set at 4.25%–4.50% (Yardeni Research) – see chart below.
By comparison:
- The European Central Bank’s Deposit Facility Rate stands at 2.00%, and
- The Bank of Japan’s overnight rate is only 0.50%.
Source: Yardeni Research
Fed Chair Jerome Powell has held off on further cuts, citing the need for more clarity on inflation and labor market data, especially in light of recent tariffs. Ironically, when the Fed last cut rates by -1.00% late last year, the 10-year Treasury yield rose by roughly +1% (see chart above), reflecting fears of rising inflation.
This week, the Fed held rates steady for the fifth consecutive meeting (YouTube). Notably, two FOMC members—Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman—dissented, voting in favor of a rate cut. It was the first dual dissent by Fed governors in over 30 years—a clear signal of division inside the central bank.
Meme Dreams
With the major indexes at new highs, speculation has returned in full force. Money-losing, struggling companies like Opendoor Technologies, GoPro Inc., and Kohl’s Corp. saw their shares double, triple, or even quadruple over a short span (WSJ) – see chart below. We saw similar trends occur during the GameStop and AMC meme craze in 2021.
Source: The Wall Street Journal
Adding fuel to the fire:
- Cryptocurrency prices are on the rise again.
- Euphorically priced IPOs (Initial Public Offerings) like Figma, Inc. (FIG), which more than tripled in value ($115 per share) on its first trading day above its offering price ($33 per share) valuing the company above $50 billion – more than 30 times next year’s forecasted revenues.
- SPACs (Special Purpose Acquisition Companies)—often criticized for poor governance—are staging a comeback.
Combined, all these trends raise concerns about froth, which investors have experienced at previous peaks.
Climb in AI Stocks Persists
No discussion of this rally would be complete without highlighting the AI mega-cap giants. Companies like Alphabet (Google), Meta (Facebook), Microsoft, and Amazon all recently announced capital expenditures for 2025 that will likely exceed an astounding $350 billion —most of it allocated to AI infrastructure.
Meanwhile, NVIDIA Corp., the AI-chip juggernaut and major beneficiary of all the AI capex, has seen its share price soar +63% in just three months, reaching a staggering $4.4 trillion market value.
Source: Yardeni Research
Valuations High but Fundamentals Remain Strong
While stock valuations remain elevated above historical averages (the S&P 500 red line trades at 22x forward earnings, according to Yardeni) – see chart above, the macro backdrop remains supportive:
- The economy is strong,
- Unemployment is low,
- Corporate profits are growing, and
- Monetary policy may turn more accommodative in coming months.
In this momentum environment, the market should continue its productive juggling, but if the frothy or economic winds worsen, investors should be prepared for a dropped ball.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (August 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in GOOGL, META, AMZN, MSFT, NVDA, and certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in OPEN, GPRO, KSS, GME, AMC, FIG or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
Mideast War an Investor Bore as Markets Soar
If I told you at the beginning of the year that the U.S. would bomb key nuclear sites in Iran, would you have guessed that Middle East stability would follow—and that global financial markets would soar to record highs? Personally, I wouldn’t have bet on that outcome. But that’s exactly what happened last month. While geopolitical dynamics remain fluid, markets shrugged off the chaos. The S&P 500 rallied +5.0%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed +4.3%, and the NASDAQ catapulted +6.6%, powered largely by artificial intelligence stocks like NVIDIA Corp., which surged +16.9% for the month to a market value of $3.9 trillion (more on AI below). This is an important reminder that trading off of news headlines is a fool’s errand.
Economy Resilient Despite Tariffs and Geopolitical Turmoil
Source: Calafia Beach Pundit
Credit Default Swaps (CDS) act as insurance contracts that protect investors against corporate debt defaults. During financial stress—like the 2008 crisis or the COVID crash in 2020—CDS prices surge as investors seek protection. Today, however, CDS prices are falling across both high-yield (junk bonds) and investment-grade (Blue Chip) debt. As seen in the chart above, the cost to insure corporate bonds has declined steadily over the past two years. This signals bond investors aren’t worried about a recession or a wave of defaults, despite tariff policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and modest GDP growth.
Inflation Tame as Tariffs Loom
President Trump has repeatedly criticized Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not cutting interest rates, calling him everything from a “dummy” to a “major loser” and a “stupid person” to a “numbskull”. While the name-calling is colorful, the economic pressure is real: U.S. GDP contracted -0.5% in Q1 2025. Powell, however, wants to see the full impact of upcoming tariffs before making a move. . A new tariff deadline looms on July 9th, and the market is anxiously awaiting clarity. But even if tariffs are implemented, many economists believe the inflationary impact will be temporary—what’s known as a one-time price shock.
Source: Calafia Beach Pundit
The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge—the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index—has been easing and is now near the 2% target (see chart above). With inflation cooling, Trump’s case for rate cuts gains credibility. Still, the Fed appears in no rush. It will take time to understand the lasting effects of the tariff rollout.
AI Wave Fueling Markets
For a generation, the semiconductor revolution has quietly powered innovation, guided by Moore’s Law—the principle that chip performance doubles roughly every two years (see my article The Traitorous 8). Sixty years after Gordon Moore wrote his seminal article, “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits”, the power of software is catching up. NVIDIA’s Grace Blackwell GB200 chip contains an astronomical 208 billion transistors, supercharging AI software models like ChatGPT.
The AI revolution is fueling trillions in global investment and rapidly transforming industries – from data centers and self-driving cars to robotics and drug discovery. It’s important to realize that this AI arms race is not just occurring in the United States. AI investment spending extends way beyond Silicon Valley to countries like Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and China.
The AI boom is not a U.S.-only phenomenon. Countries like China, Saudi Arabia, and Singapore are pouring capital into AI, creating a global arms race in tech. In the U.S., the four biggest hyperscalers—Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and Meta—are projected to spend over $300 billion on capital expenditures in 2025 alone (see chart below).
To illustrate the scale: Amazon is forecasted to spend more than $100 billion in CapEx this year. For context, that’s 40% more than the company spent over the entire 2000–2020 period combined.
Source: The Financial Times
The Stargate Initiative: AI Infrastructure on a Galactic Scale
A prime example of the AI gold rush is the $500 billion Stargate initiative, with Phase 1 already underway in Abilene, Texas (see rendering below). The initial construction includes two buildings totaling 1,000,000 square feet. Ultimately, the full project will cove about 1,000 acres and be powered by an on-site natural gas facility generating 360 megawatts—enough to support 300,000 homes.
A huge portion of the project costs are dedicated to the budget for NVIDIA super chips. Oracle Corp. has committed $40 billion to purchase 400,000 of NVIDIA’s GB200 chips, making this project a centerpiece of the global AI infrastructure boom. Just this week, Oracle also announced a new $30 billion cloud deal, which will soak up a good chunk of the data center supply created by the database and enterprise software company.
Source: CoStar
The Big Picture: Volatility and Opportunity
There’s no shortage of risk—geopolitics, inflation, Fed uncertainty, tariffs. But the economy is showing surprising resilience. If tariff clarity improves, interest rate cuts materialize, and AI capital spending accelerates, a “boring” market could rapidly turn into a soaring one.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (July 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Tariffs & Free Trade by Wade
Tariffs and trade have dominated the media headlines since the beginning of the year, creating a volatile rollercoaster ride in the financial markets and broader economy. What were screams of fear just last month turned into cheers of optimism after a trade deal between the U.S. and the U.K. was announced earlier this month.
This agreement—combined with hopes for future trade deals and the absence of runaway inflation or economic collapse—sparked a rally in stock prices. The minimum 10% baseline tariff in the U.K. agreement has fueled optimism that a simplified framework might extend to other international trade pacts. For the month, the S&P 500 surged by +6.2%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed +3.9%, and the tech-heavy NASDAQ soared by +9.6%.
However, tariffs and trade haven’t faded into the background. In fact, just this week, a federal court ruled that the president’s tariff policies were illegal, citing misuse of emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. Subsequently, the same court has granted the Trump administration a reprieve pending appeal—potentially escalating the issue to the Supreme Court. Even if the ruling stands, the president has alternative avenues to impose tariffs through other legal mechanisms.
So, what is all this fuss over tariffs and trade really about? I’ve previously written extensively on the topic (“Tariff Sheriff”), but some fundamental economic concepts still get lost in the tariff chaos noise.
It’s true that many countries engage in unfair trade practices against the U.S.—including subsidies, currency manipulation, non-tariff barriers, dumping, quotas, complex permitting, and value-added taxes (VAT). However, the powerful benefits of free trade are often underappreciated or poorly explained by the pundits.
Tariffs and Free Trade 101: China & France Experiment
To illustrate, let’s reference an example drawn from an op-ed by Princeton economist Burton Malkiel, author of the legendary finance book A Random Walk Down Wall Street.
Every country enjoys a comparative advantage in producing certain goods. For example, China historically benefits from low labor costs, making it a global manufacturing hub. Meanwhile, the U.S. leads in technological innovation, and countries like Brazil leverage vast land resources to dominate agricultural exports—such as being the world’s top coffee exporter. Let’s consider a simplified example using two countries: China and France, each with 100 labor hours available, and only able to produce T-shirts and wine.
China’s Output (see graphic above) – China’s comparative advantage in making more T-shirts than bottles of wine results in the following:
- 50 hours = 50 T-shirts
- 50 hours = 10 bottles of wine
France’s Output (see graphic above) – France’s comparative advantage in making more bottles of wine than T-shirts results in the following:
- 50 hours = 50 bottles of wine
- 50 hours = 20 T-shirts
Combined Total (China + France): 70 T-shirts + 60 bottles of wine = 130 total units of goods.
Example #2: Production Plan #2 (Each country specializes in their comparative advantage)
China’s Output (T-shirt specialization):
- 100 hours = 100 T-shirts
France’s Output (Wine specialization):
- 100 hours = 100 bottles of wine
Combined Total: 100 T-shirts + 100 bottles of wine = 200 total units of goods.
But here’s the challenge: the Chinese still want wine, and the French still want T-shirts. That’s where free trade comes in – see next example (graphic below).
Example #3: Production Plan #2 + Free Trade
Through free trade, each country can specialize in what they do best and then trade for other goods wanted or needed. If China trades 50 T-shirts for 50 bottles of wine with France, both countries end up with:
- China: 50 T-shirts + 50 bottles of wine
- France: 50 bottles of wine + 50 T-shirts
This plan produces 54% more total goods than the original production plan (200 vs. 130 – Example #1), with no increase in labor hours. China gets 300% more wine, and France gets 150% more T-shirts—a clear win-win.
Today’s Tariff Reality
In 2024, the U.S. trade deficit stood at $918 billion. President Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy aims to reduce this gap by incentivizing domestic manufacturing, increasing exports, and reducing imports. The challenge is that tariffs also raise prices for consumers and disrupt the benefits of free trade.
If the administration succeeds in establishing fairer rules for a level trading field, increasing government revenue, and narrowing the trade deficit, then history will likely view President Trump’s tariff policy favorably. But if tariffs lead to higher prices, inflation, and a weaker economy, the tariff policy may be judged as a costly misstep. The stock market, voters, and time will ultimately serve as the principal judges.
Looking ahead, two key dates are on the calendar:
- July 9 marks the end of the 90-day reciprocal tariff pause. Without new trade agreements, tariffs will spike on imports from many countries — raising costs for consumers.
- July 4 is not only Independence Day, but also the target date for Senate Republicans to pass the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, which packages several of President Trump’s top priorities: tax cuts, welfare reform, energy expansion, and border security. While the bill could stimulate growth, critics warn of its potential to balloon the national deficit.
Most Americans support the idea of fairer global trade. The question is whether aggressive tariffs across the globe are the right tool to achieve that goal — and whether trading partners will agree to new deals. Regardless of the outcome, this crash course in Tariffs & Free Trade 101 underscores the enduring value of specialization and free trade, even amid today’s turbulent tariff battles.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (June 2, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Turn Off TV – Emperor Media Has No Clothes!
Famous Danish author Hans Christian Andersen told a renowned fairy tale of an emperor who was conned into believing he is wearing an invisible suit. The crowd was too embarrassed to acknowledge his nakedness, so they pretend to not notice – until a young boy shouted, “The emperor has no clothes!”
Much like the fairy tale, when it comes to pointing out the many shortcomings of the financial media, I have no problem yelling, “The Emperor Media has no clothes!”
Media Spreads Fear and Misinformation
Mark Twain famously stated, “If you don’t read the newspaper, you’re uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you’re misinformed.” That sentiment rings especially true amid today’s swirl of alarming headlines. Here’s a sampling of recent media-induced worries:
- Global trade war caused by tariffs
- Declining value of the U.S. dollar
- Rising interest rates due to foreign debt sales
- Doubts over the U.S. dollar’s global reserve currency status
- Recession anxiety
- Stagflation fears
- Concerns about Executive Branch overreach
- Threats to remove the Federal Reserve Chairman
Is the sky falling? Is now the time to sell stocks, as the media often implies? Or are these risks being overstated and distorted by media outlets that chase monetary gains?
Issues are More Gray Than Black or White
Journalists – most of whom have little investing experience – like to authoritatively paint economic issues in black-or-white terms. But most reasonable people understand that these matters are complex, and the truth lies somewhere in the gray. To claim the media offers a balanced view of both the positives and negatives of complicated financial topics would be disingenuous.
I have been investing for over 30 years, and while I’ve never faced a global rebalancing of trade impacting trillions in economic activity, I’ve lived through far more uncertain times. Not only have my investments survived those volatile periods, but they have also thrived – repeatedly hitting new record highs.
F.U.D. Sells!
Does the media want you to believe the accurate, long-term stock market prosperity story? Hardly. As the saying goes, “If it bleeds, it leads.” Fear, uncertainty, and doubt (F.U.D.) sell more ads, subscriptions, newspapers, and magazines. The more blood, sweat, and anxiety in the headlines, the more money the media makes from distressed readers.
Behavioral finance pioneers, Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, showed that losses feel twice as painful as the pleasure of gains (see the Pleasure/Pain diagram below). Their Prospect Theory remains just as relevant today as when it was introduced in the late 1970s.
The greatest investor of all-time, Warren Buffett, once said, “Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful.” Unfortunately, the media pushes the opposite mantra: “sell fear and buy greed.” When markets fall, they sell Armageddon. When markets soar, they sell nirvana. During periods of over-optimism, they also exploit FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) by feasting on investors’ emotional cycle of excitement.
Reassuring long-term investors that everything will be okay—or that dips are buying opportunities—doesn’t generate as much media profits and ad sales. Fear does.
History Doesn’t Repeat Itself, But It Often Rhymes
Too many investors suffer from short-term thinking and goldfish-like memory. But as Mark Twain wisely stated, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but It often rhymes.” And history has shown that listening to the media during times of extreme market volatility often leads to poor decisions.
Let’s take a look at some key examples where media-driven fear was more misleading than helpful over the decades:
The Nifty Fifty Collapse (1973-1974)
In the early 1970s, long before the “Magnificent 7” stocks came to the fore, we had the “Nifty Fifty” stocks. These large-cap blue chip stocks traded at lofty P/E (Price-Earnings) ratios and were seen as invincible before they came crashing down in 1973-1974. Suffice it to say, the media headlines were horrific during this period.
Here is some context for this period:
- The U.S. was exiting the Vietnam War
- Economy was undergoing a major recession
- Watergate scandal and presidential resignation
- 9% unemployment
- The Arab Oil Embargo
- Surging inflation
The media’s response? Doom and gloom. Here’s an example of this sentiment from the Newsweek cover, “The Big Bad Bear,” published on September 9, 1974.
For those who sold in fear, the results were disastrous. The Dow bottomed shortly after the magazine was released and the market rebounded +61% in less than two years. Panic was the wrong move.
“The Death of Equities” (1979)
Inflation plagued the 1970s, and just before one of the longest bull markets in history, BusinessWeek declared “The Death of Equities” on its now-infamous September 1979 cover. Once again, the media acted as a perfect contrarian indicator with the Dow quadrupling over the next decade.
Dot-Com Bubble: “The Hottest Market Ever” (2000)
In March 2000, at the peak of the tech bubble, Money magazine ran a cover story: “How to Invest in the Hottest Market Ever.” Weeks later, the bubble burst. Suboptimal timing once again.
In that same timeframe, Newsweek captured the essence of FOMO with its July 5, 1999 cover: “Everyone Is Getting Rich but Me.” Right when risk was at its peak, most investors were blind to it and got sucked into the downdraft.
Source: NewsWeek
Financial Crisis – Depression 2.0 (2008)
In October 2008, the Time magazine cover encapsulated the zeitgeist of the period with a 1929 photo that included a line of desperate people waiting for food donations at a soup kitchen. Many feared a second Great Depression. Yet it was one of the best times in history to buy stocks with the Dow tripling over the next decade.
Brexit Panic (2016)
Media coverage around the U.K.’s Brexit vote to leave the EU (European Union) painted a picture of imminent recession and contagion. Instead, the media blitz surrounding Brexit turned out to be more molehill than mountain. Markets rebounded strongly and reached new highs in the subsequent months.
“Rocketman” and North Korea Missiles (2017)
Tensions flared in 2017 as North Korea tested missiles and President Trump threatened retaliation against dictator Kim Jong Un by bombing Pyongyang and “Rocket Man”. The media went into overdrive regarding the nuclear unease, but the market brushed it off and continued climbing +58% over the next few years.
COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)
With over 3 million deaths worldwide and a grinding halt to the global economy, markets initially fell roughly -35%. But as consumers stockpiled toilet paper, fast vaccine development and stimulus sparked a powerful rebound, with stocks finishing the year up +16%. Over the next two years, the Dow almost doubled.
Hostage to Our Lizard Brain
Why are we so susceptible to the sensationalist tendencies of the media? Evolution holds the answer. Humans’ DNA and brains are hard-wired to flee prey. The small almond-shaped tissue in our brain called the amygdala—or what author Seth Godin calls the “lizard brain”—evolved to respond instantly to danger. When headlines scream “crash” or “war,” our emotional brain overrides our logical one, which leads to poor long-term results. As Seth Godin explains, we’re wired to react, not reflect (Watch here). And the media knows it.
Headlines Change but the Long-Term Market Trend Doesn’t
Despite a barrage of negative headlines, stocks have remained resilient over the long run. The market has overcome wars, assassinations, currency crises, banking failures, terrorist attacks, pandemics, natural disasters, impeachments, tax hikes, recessions, restrictive Fed policies, debt downgrades, inflation, and yes, even tariffs (see chart below). Since WWII, we’ve had 12 recessions—each followed by a full recovery to new record highs. In baseball terms, the economy has batted a perfect 1.000 (12-for-12) with recession recoveries.
How to Survive the Avalanche of Media Headlines
Here are five key strategies:
- Turn off the TV: Don’t obsess over headlines. Emotional reactions result in poor decisions.
Buying high (greed) and selling low (fear) is not a recipe for long-term investment success.
- Diversify Your Investments: A well-balanced portfolio across asset classes helps reduce panic.
- Invest According to Time Horizon: Are you young? Assuming more risk and higher exposure to the stock market is generally fine. Are you near retirement? Don’t jeopardize your retirement goals – de-risk accordingly.
- Ignore Talking Heads: Most pundits don’t invest and their credibility is compromised by monetary conflicts of interest. It’s much more beneficial to follow seasoned professionals with real track records through multiple bull and bear markets.
- Avoid the Herd: Continually following the herd into the most popular investments often leads to underperformance. The grass is greener, and the food sources are more plentiful, off the beaten path trampled by the herd. Contrarian thinking works even though it can feel scary.
In the age of constant connectivity, headlines and the 24/7 news cycle are addictive. But if you’re tired of being a pawn in the media’s game, I invite you to join my fight by acknowledging that the Emperor Media has no clothes.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (May 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Animal Spirits to Animal Hibernation
Investor mood or sentiment can change rather quickly. Immediately after the 2024 presidential elections, positive animal spirits catapulted the stock market higher due to hopes of stimulating tax cuts and deregulation legislation. However, those warm and fuzzy feelings soured last month, as investor focus shifted to on-again, off-again tariff talks, and stagflation concerns, which have converted animal spirits into gloomy feelings of hibernation.
As a result, the advancing bull market took a breather and transformed into a weary bear during March. For the month, the S&P 500 (-5.8%), NASDAQ (-8.2%), and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-4.2%) all fell significantly in the wake of tariffs, inflation, and recession worries.
Lovely Liberation Day or Tariff Trouble?
Since the President took office in January, he has announced, reversed, and implemented tariffs across a wide range of countries and sectors, including China, Canada, Mexico, the EU, Colombia, Venezuela, steel, aluminum, oil, automobiles, digital services taxes, and more.
The day of reckoning begins on April 2nd, designated Liberation Day by the president. This is when the president and the White House officially announce global reciprocal tariffs on foreign countries in an attempt to reverse the nation’s large trade deficit (see chart below) and bring manufacturing back to the United States. For example, if Germany subsidizes BMW cars sold in the U.S. while simultaneously placing tariffs (i.e., additional taxes) on American Ford Explorers sold in Germany, the president wants to impose equivalent reciprocal tariffs on those same BMWs sold in the U.S. in an effort to level the trading playing field. On the surface, a $131 billion trade deficit sounds very significant, but when compared to a $30 trillion economy (Gross Domestic Product – GDP), this negative trade balance represents less than 0.5% of GDP – effectively a rounding error. I have previously written how tariffs represent more of a molehill than a mountain (see Tariff Sheriff), in part because consumer spending and services make up the vast majority of our country’s economic activity, whereas trade and manufacturing are relatively smaller segments.
Source: Trading Economics
Driving home the point that tariffs are more bark than bite, Senior White House trade and manufacturing counselor Peter Navarro recently stated the 2025 tariffs could add $700 billion annually to U.S. revenues, including $100 billion from the recently announced 25% auto tariffs. Many economists believe this collection estimate is too optimistic. However, even if this target is achievable, $700 billion only represents a measly 2% of overall GDP.
Tariffs = Recession or Stagflation?
With the recent stock market downdraft and growing concerns related to tariffs, some economists and pundits are raising the probability of a recession and the possibility of inflation accompanying an economic downturn (i.e., stagflation).
Economic data should clear some of the fog. Fresh employment numbers will be released this Friday, which should shine some light on the health of the economy. Irrespective of this month’s results, the most recent 4.1% unemployment rate (see chart below), though slightly higher over the last two years, does not strongly indicate a recession.
Source: Trading Economics
Other “hard” data, such as GDP, also suggest a slowing economy rather than a recession. For instance, a recent survey of 14 economists estimates the economy is growing at a paltry +0.3% rate in Q1 – 2025 versus +2.3% in Q4 – 2024. Data is continually changing, but if a looming recession were imminent, corporate earnings would likely be trending downward, not upwards, as evident in the chart below.
Source: Yardeni Research
Tariff Inflation Has Yet to Arrive
There is no doubt tariffs function as a tax hike on consumers because U.S. companies that pay the tariffs on imported goods are eventually forced to raise prices to maintain profit margins or limit margin degradation.
Nonetheless, inflation did not spike under President Trump’s first term. Even if the president’s new policies result in more aggressive tariff actions this go-around, inflation will likely remain in check due to the point mentioned earlier – imported goods represent a small percentage of overall consumer and business purchases.
Tariff implementation is just beginning, so only time will tell how pervasive inflation will become. However, what we do know now is that inflation has declined dramatically over the last couple of years and has not yet spiked (see Consumer Price Index chart below).
Source: Calafia Beach Pundit
Where Could I Be Wrong?
I have explained how some of the lagging “hard” data does not signal recession or stagflation, but what could I be missing? For starters, some of the leading “soft” data (e.g., surveys) indicate various cracks in the economic foundation are forming. Take the recent Consumer Confidence data (see chart below), which has weakened dramatically from pre-COVID and even post-COVID levels.
Source: Trading Economics
It’s not just consumers who are feeling uneasy about the economic environment; businesses are as well. Another soft data point flashing red is the NFIB Small Business Uncertainty index, which recently reported its second-highest reading in 48 years (see chart below). Even if my argument that tariffs are too small to materially impact the economy holds, if the psychological effects of tariff uncertainty paralyzes consumer and business economic activity to a standstill, then tariffs could indeed become a substantial factor.
Source: National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB)
What Comes Next After Liberation Day?
Liberation Day is unlikely to trigger an immediate and sustained V-shaped recovery in the stock market because international trading partners will be forced to announce retaliatory tariffs in response to President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, potentially leading to additional reactionary tariffs by the U.S.
Additionally, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2nd will likely serve as a starting point for subsequent negotiations with trading partners. Without a comprehensive resolution, investor sentiment will likely remain somewhat unresolved and unsettled. Regardless of your views on the size and impact of tariffs, Liberation Day will at least bring some clarity and reduce the uncertainty surrounding the current murky and chaotic environment.
The multi-year bull market continued its charge after the presidential election, but investor sentiment has weakened the bull run due to tariff uncertainty. In response, the excited bull has temporarily turned into a sleepy bear. Depending on how these tariff events unfold, we will soon find out whether Liberation Day will awaken the bear to hunt for bulls or send it into deep hibernation.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (April 1, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in F or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
Par for the Course
Stocks have been in a multi-year bull market, but just as investors cannot earn positive returns every month, golfers also cannot achieve a hole-in-one or birdie on every hole, either. A challenging performance is exactly what happened last month when stocks recorded a bogey on the scorecard.
More specifically, this is how far out-of-bounds the major indexes were last month:
- S&P 500: -1.4%
- Dow Jones Industrial Average -1.6%
- NASDAQ: -4.0%
Technology stocks and the Magnificent 7 stocks felt the largest brunt of the force last month as tariffs and the impact of Chinese AI (Artificial Intelligence) competition gave investors heartburn as they digested the information (see New Year, New AI ERA & New Tariff Sheriff).
Tariffs – More Molehill Than Mountain
As mentioned, a large part of last month’s volatility can be explained by the policy uncertainty surrounding the impending tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico. Despite the absence of new tariffs being implemented, in an attempt to lock in cheaper imported goods, U.S. corporations and consumers have been stockpiling foreign goods before prices move higher due to tariffs. The 25% proposed tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods are set to be applied as soon as March 4th. A flat 25% tariff on imported steel and aluminum products is expected to begin on March 12th – these particular tariffs are expected to have a disproportionately negative impact on the automotive industry.
Regarding other proposed reciprocal trade agreements, the White House’s analysis on tariffs for all other countries (beyond China, Canada, and Mexico) is expected to arrive on the president’s desk on April 2nd.
All these proposed changes are having an immediate economic impact whether intended or not. Not only are consumers buying more overseas products now, as they brace for higher prices, but businesses are also shifting supply chains to countries outside of China, Canada, and Mexico, in hopes of finding temporary tariff loopholes.
The bottom-line is our country’s imports have been spiking up recently, especially in the first quarter. Imports by definition subtract from America’s economic activity, so if businesses and consumers are rationally stockpiling foreign goods before prices go up from tariffs, investors should not be surprised that GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth is set to go negative in the first quarter (-1.5%), according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
This short-term spike in foreign product purchases should be temporary until the tariffs are officially put in place. Subsequently, demand for relatively cheaper U.S. goods should rise because foreign goods will be pricier. In other words, buyers may begin purchasing more American-made t-shirts on Amazon because those shirts could be cheaper than the Chinese-made t-shirts after the additional tariffs commence on China.
How large are these overall tariffs? When it comes to Mexico and Canada, the size of these countries’ imports is estimated at $918 billion (see the 2023 import breakdown below for the two countries). On the surface, this sounds like a very large number, and it is. However, if you consider the size of the U.S. GDP ($29.4 trillion), these tariffs will mathematically have less than a 1% impact on the direction of our country’s economic activity.
However, if demand for American products goes up after the tariffs begin, as mentioned above, then it is perfectly logical to expect the drag from imports can be diminished or possibly completely reversed, if consumers decide to buy more American goods.
Source: Visual Capitalist
Also worth noting, as I documented last month in my Investing Caffeine blog, imports only account for 13.9% of our country’s economic activity (see New Tariff Sheriff). So, while tariffs make for great scary headlines, the reality of the numbers paints a different picture. Overall, the uncertainty surrounding the discussion of tariffs is having a much larger economic impact than the actual tariffs themselves. In other words, what we are discussing is more molehill than mountain. We saw this same movie before during the administration’s first-term when tariffs did not crater the economy into recession or create disproportionately high inflation.
War at the White House
A geopolitical soap opera played out on global television last Friday during a meeting between Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Trump in the Oval Office. The meeting was designed to be a celebratory signing of a minerals deal in which the U.S. would gain access to strategically important Ukrainian rare earth metals in exchange for continued U.S. aid and military support. A signed deal would increase the probability of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine dramatically. What actually happened was a war of words at the White House, which resulted in Zelensky getting kicked out of the White House with no signed deal.
Both sides have economic and strategic incentives to reengage in peace and mineral deal negotiations, but if the U.S.-Ukraine relationship totally crumbles, Europe and the other NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) countries will need to pick up the slack in their military and economic aid to Ukraine. Regardless, increased European support is required to stave off a broader incursion by Russia and Vladimir Putin into a wider portion of Europe.
Tariffs, the Russia-Ukraine war, and AI issues may have heightened investor anxiety last month, but long-term investors understand that annual -5% and -10% corrections in the equity markets are considered par for the course. In fact, over the last 12 months, the S&P 500 index has declined -5% five times, and -10% one time, yet the stock market is still up +16% on a trailing 12-month basis (see chart below).
Source: Trading Economics
Financial markets end up in the rough plenty of the time, which often results in performance scorecard bogeys. However, long-term investors and Sidoxia Capital Management clients have won more often than not because the benefits of American capitalism have created many more birdies and pars over time.
Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®
Plan. Invest. Prosper.
This article is an excerpt from a previously released Sidoxia Capital Management complimentary newsletter (March 3, 2025). Subscribe Here to view all monthly articles.
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in META, NVDA, certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in BABA or any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on the IC Contact page.
How to Profit from the Trump Crypto Wave
We were honored to have our white paper on the cryptocurrency market published by the California Business Journal last month. Please enjoy the article below.
Newly inaugurated President Donald Trump has wholeheartedly embraced the multi-trillion dollar cryptocurrency and digital asset industry. This is a seismic shift from the anti-crypto stance harbored by the previous administration. In the first week of his second term, President Trump not only appointed crypto-friendly Paul Atkins as the SEC Chairman, but Trump also named David Sacks as the first-ever White House Crypto Czar. If that was not a strong enough signal, Trump issued an executive order on his third day in the Oval Office, entitled, “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology.”
With this massive political and legislative tailwind behind the cryptocurrency industry, what is the best way to profit from this cryptocurrency wave? Is it just as easy as buying Bitcoin? Not exactly, if history repeats itself. Since Bitcoin was introduced in early 2009, the value of the cryptocurrency has fallen by more than -50% seven times. There have been many causes for Bitcoin’s historical volatility, including the hacking of the largest Bitcoin exchange in 2011 (Mt. Gox); China banning Bitcoin in 2013; and the COVID pandemic crash in 2020. Matters got worse for the cryptocurrency industry when FTX, one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges went bankrupt in 2022, and its founder and CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried, was subsequently arrested and convicted for fraud and money laundering.
Investing in a currency or asset class with that much volatility is very challenging. To compensate for volatility and risk, investors require the potential for higher returns backed by robust fundamentals. Unfortunately, to date, many of the broadest use cases for cryptocurrencies have been limited to illicit and illegal activities. There certainly are some speed and security advantages to the blockchain technology and the associated ledger structure of the major cryptocurrencies. However, the benefits have not been so clear-cut that Fortune 1000 companies and mass consumers have adopted it. A relatively small 15.5% of Americans (and 6.9% worldwide) are estimated to own a cryptocurrency, and a smaller fraction of that actually transact in a crypto.
Even though the practical use cases for cryptocurrencies over the last two decades have been extremely constrained, the speculative fervor surrounding this asset class has grown exponentially to the point there are over an estimated 10,000 cryptocurrencies that exist today, including speculative meme coins such as Dogecoin, the Trump coin, and other crude joke coins.
In my more than three decades of investing, I have repeatedly encountered extensive segments of the financial markets that would qualify as speculative bubbles, whether it was subprime mortgages and credit default swaps (CDS) in the 2008 Financial Crisis, or dot-com companies in the 2000 bursting of the technology bubble.
Today, in 2025, the current cryptocurrency wave definitely qualifies as another bubble. But depending on an investor’s time horizon, there is still potential to make significant profits during these frothy investment waves. For example, take Amazon.com, which was at the epicenter of the dot-com bubble as it saw its stock price crater approximately -95% in the 2000-2001 timeframe. Before Amazon’s stock collapsed, its price peaked at $5.65 per share at the end of 1999 – today, the stock price in 2025 has exceeded $240 per share (a more than 40-fold increase). Despite the bursting of the tech bubble, a tremendous amount of money has been made by long-term investors in Amazon and a select few other long-term technology winners.
I believe the same opportunity exists today in the cryptocurrency market. There are a few historical parallels that inform our crypto investment strategy at my investment firm, Sidoxia Capital Management. Let’s begin with the gambling industry that flourished in Las Vegas during the 1940s after the end of Prohibition. It was not the gamblers and speculators that made all the money, but rather the casinos, including some remaining today like the Flamingo and the Golden Nugget.
Currently, the dominant casino in the cryptocurrency industry is Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN). Coinbase is the 800-pound gorilla in the U.S. cryptocurrency exchange space, handling transactions that total more than $4 billion in daily trading volume across hundreds of cryptocurrencies, stable coins, meme coins and other digital assets. And the company is highly profitable with substantial growth. More specifically, the company has generated more than $5 billion in sales and greater than $1 billion in profits over the last year. Just like Las Vegas casinos make money off every gambler’s bets, so too does Coinbase make profits off every crypto speculator’s trades, whether those transactions in Bitcoin, Tether, Ethereum, or meme coins go up or down in value.
Another lucrative way for investors to look at the nascent cryptocurrency industry is to compare it to the California gold rush that occurred from 1848 – 1855. Hundreds of thousands of “forty-niners” (the peak year of gold rush immigration – 1849) flocked out west in hopes of discovering perceived limitless riches – an attitude held by many cryptocurrency purchasers presently. Unfortunately, it was not the forty-niners digging and panning for gold who made most of the money, it was the merchants selling all the picks and shovels to the gold rush speculators that profited the greatest.
The contemporary merchants in today’s cryptocurrency world are companies like NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA), the creator of the graphics processing unit (GPU) semiconductors that power the critical mining operations of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. The GPUs serve as the picks and shovels for crypto miners who receive rewards in the form of cryptocurrencies (i.e., Bitcoin) in return for performing computationally intensive calculations, which are necessary to verify transactions on a digital decentralized crypto ledger. NVIDIA GPUs have a broad range of applications beyond crypto mining, including data center applications for artificial intelligence (AI), video games, gene sequencing, virtual-augmented reality, and other large-scale markets. Over the last year, NVIDIA has produced more than $110 billion in sales and created more than $60 billion in net profits. Not only was NVDIA successful commercially, but equity investors were also rewarded handsomely last year with an appreciation of +171% in the share price.
There are plenty of reasons to remain skeptical about the euphoria surrounding the cryptocurrency industry, especially due to the lack of legitimate use cases across the avalanche of digital assets endlessly introduced. However, the pro-crypto wave of Trump regulations and policies allow plenty of ways for investors to profit from this digital gold rush, especially if you can find the winning crypto casino and leading merchant of digital picks and shovels.
By Wade W. Slome, CFA, CFP®, Exclusive to California Business Journal
DISCLOSURE: Sidoxia Capital Management (SCM) and some of its clients hold positions in NVDA, COIN, IBIT, and certain exchange traded funds (ETFs), but at the time of publishing had no direct position in any other security referenced in this article. No information accessed through the Investing Caffeine (IC) website constitutes investment, financial, legal, tax or other advice nor is to be relied on in making an investment or other decision. Please read disclosure language on IC Contact page.
Investing Caffeine 
